Re: [OPSAWG] network management data models - a rewrite

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
 
> Shorting up the FCAPS-based view to a few lines is not
> helpful. There is a need for a detailed survey as a guidance for the
> audience of the document.

One more example: Look at section 4.3 Accounting Management providing
a list of different IPFIX information elements. Is that the level of
detail you find appropriate? How many of the information elements
listed there do you think are important for Accounting Management? Do
you propose to have the IEs listed as well in sections 4.1 Fault
Management, 4.4 Performance Management, and 4.5 Security Management?

If we talk about FCAPS, we will only finish in finite time by staying
abstract.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>