Re: DR election

"Krishnan, Vijay G." <Vijay.G.Krishnan@MARCONI.COM> Mon, 02 May 2005 16:26 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA01252 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:26:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <18.0102FDA2@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:26:17 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 68988170 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:26:14 -0400
Received: from 169.144.68.6 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:38 -0400
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j42GFcVg003995 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com (uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA14975 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <J70JTVT1>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF06DAD22A@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:15:35 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: "Krishnan, Vijay G." <Vijay.G.Krishnan@MARCONI.COM>
Subject: Re: DR election
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

The first router does not become the DR immediately. It waits for its
configurable "wait timer" to expire, before electing the DR. Others routers
could come up during this time. Once the DR is elected, addition of new
routers would not change the DR. This will reduce the instability due to the
DR changes.

regards
Vijay



-----Original Message-----
From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of Ilan
Bercovich
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: DR election


Hello
If all routers accept the DR regardless of their Router Priority,
It means that actually the first active router on the LAN is the DR.
Isn't this makes the Router Priority parameter somewhat irrelevant?
(In RSTP for instance, when priority is changed - network is
re-calculated).
Ilan