Re: DR election
"Krishnan, Vijay G." <Vijay.G.Krishnan@MARCONI.COM> Mon, 02 May 2005 16:26 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA01252 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:26:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <18.0102FDA2@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:26:17 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 68988170 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:26:14 -0400
Received: from 169.144.68.6 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:38 -0400
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j42GFcVg003995 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com (uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA14975 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <J70JTVT1>; Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF06DAD22A@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:15:35 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: "Krishnan, Vijay G." <Vijay.G.Krishnan@MARCONI.COM>
Subject: Re: DR election
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
The first router does not become the DR immediately. It waits for its configurable "wait timer" to expire, before electing the DR. Others routers could come up during this time. Once the DR is elected, addition of new routers would not change the DR. This will reduce the instability due to the DR changes. regards Vijay -----Original Message----- From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM]On Behalf Of Ilan Bercovich Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:51 AM To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM Subject: DR election Hello If all routers accept the DR regardless of their Router Priority, It means that actually the first active router on the LAN is the DR. Isn't this makes the Router Priority parameter somewhat irrelevant? (In RSTP for instance, when priority is changed - network is re-calculated). Ilan
- DR election Dror
- Re: DR election Igor Miroshnik
- Re: DR election Russ White
- Re: DR election Zebaida, Dror (Dror)
- Re: DR election Acee Lindem
- Re: DR election Phil Chen
- Re: DR election Zebaida, Dror (Dror)
- Re: DR election Vivek Dubey
- Re: DR election Michael J Barnes
- Re: DR election kamatchi soundaram
- Re: DR election kamatchi soundaram
- DR election Ilan Bercovich
- Re: DR election Krishnan, Vijay G.
- Re: DR election Erblichs
- Re: DR election Naresh Paliwal
- Re: DR election Acee Lindem
- Re: DR election Erblichs
- A writeup on interface state machine (Re: DR elec… Mukul Goyal
- Re: DR election Acee Lindem
- Re: A writeup on interface state machine (Re: DR … Filippo Cugini