Re: DR election

[Vivek Dubey <[e-mail]>]

As Acee pointed out R4 will become the DR and there
is no change for BDR.

Have seen the scenario you described below
while experimenting !!!!


On Tue, 13 May 2003 Zebaida, Dror (Dror) wrote :
>Hi Phil,
>
>I don't mean exactly a partitioned network. This is what I
>mean:
>
>1)      R1 -------------------R2
>                          |
>                          |     N10
>                          |
>                 R3
>
>2) All connected and R3 is elected to be the DR since it has the
>highest router ID.
>
>3) R4 is configured to run ospf on an interface belonging to N10.
>However it is not physically connecet to N10
>
>4) R4 is transitioned out of it WAIT state after 40 seconds
>thinking it's alone on N10 (not receiving any HELLOS)
>
>5) R4 is physically connected to N10
>
>6) R1/R2/R3 all send HELLOS with R3 DR and R2 BDR.    R4 sends
>HELLO with R4 DR
>
>7) what happens now???        R3 remains DR  or   R4 is selected
>to be DR.
>
>
>Hope this is clear
>Thanks
>Dror
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Chen [mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 4:29 PM
>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: DR election
>
>
>If I understand you correctly, you are talking about a situation
>where a IP subnetwork is partitioned (may be due to some layer 2
>problems) where each partition may have tis own DR/BDR. In this
>case, when partitions are merged, R4 will be the new DR for the
>final healed IP subnetwork. R3 will become DR-other. R2 remains
>as BDR (unless there is another BDR from other partition).
>
>--Phil
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From: Zebaida, Dror (Dror) [mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 8:04 AM
>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: DR election
>
>
>I understand that if there is already a DR/BDR then R4 will not
>become the DR.
>However, when an interface transitions out of the WAIT state, if
>it thinks it is
>alone on the network, it declares itself the DR.  If after that,
>it connects to the
>network, there are 2 routers declaring themselves DR. In our case
>R3 and R4.
>At this stage, is a new DR elected, or does R3 remain the DR.
>
>The scenario I am describing is R4 is conneced to the network
>after it transitioned
>out of the WAIT state (after 40 seconds)
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From: Russ White [mailto:[e-mail]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 2:56 PM
>To: [e-mail]
>Subject: Re: DR election
>
>
>As long as there is already a dr on the link, R4 would not take
>over as the
>DR. Or it shouldn't. Think of it this way: The DR isn't elected
>first, the
>BDR is. Then the routers attached to the link "discover" there is
>no DR,
>and promote the BDR to DR, and elect a new BDR.
>
>:-)
>
>Russ
>
>On Tue, 13 May 2003, Dror wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding a DR election algorithm.  If I
>have a netowrk
> > with 3 routers R1,-R3, each having the same priority and with
>router IDs
> > 0.0.0.1, 0.0.0.2, 0.0.0.3 respectively.
> >
> > After a DR election process is done, R3 will be DR, R2 will be
>BDR and R1
> > will be DR-Other.  This is the result of the DR election
>process since R3
> > has the largest router ID.
> >
> > If I add a new router R4 with router ID 0.0.0.4, do I expect
>R4 to become
> > the DR, or does it just become another DR-other since there is
>already a DR
> > in the network.
> >
> > Does the result depend on whether R4 is connected to the
>network when it is
> > still in the WAIT state, or the result is the same
>nevertheless.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Dror
> >
>
>__________________________________
>[e-mail] CCIE <>< Grace Alone

___________________________________________________
Get email that means BUSINESS! me @ mycompany.com.
Just Rs.1499/year.
To start, click http://www.rediffmailpro.com