Re: DR election

Igor Miroshnik <IgorM@RADLAN.COM> Tue, 13 May 2003 11:39 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA04485 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:39:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <5.009BDD60@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 13 May 2003 7:42:29 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 665587 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:42:28 -0400
Received: from 209.119.0.100 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:42:28 -0400
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <3.009BDED2@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 13 May 2003 7:42:28 -0400
Message-ID: <LISTSERV%2003051307422849@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 07:42:28 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Igor Miroshnik <IgorM@RADLAN.COM>
Subject: Re: DR election
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

On Tue, 13 May 2003 06:57:34 -0400, Dror <dzebaida@AVAYA.COM> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have a question regarding a DR election algorithm.  If I have a netowrk
>with 3 routers R1,-R3, each having the same priority and with router IDs
>0.0.0.1, 0.0.0.2, 0.0.0.3 respectively.
>
>After a DR election process is done, R3 will be DR, R2 will be BDR and R1
>will be DR-Other.  This is the result of the DR election process since R3
>has the largest router ID.
>
>If I add a new router R4 with router ID 0.0.0.4, do I expect R4 to become
>the DR, or does it just become another DR-other since there is already a DR
>in the network.
>
>Does the result depend on whether R4 is connected to the network when it is
>still in the WAIT state, or the result is the same nevertheless.
>
>Thanks
>Dror

In case of DR/BDR having already been elected, no new DR/BDR election will
ensue, since only R3 lists itself as DR, and only R2 lists itself as BDR.
R4 will analyze the BDR-candidate list of a single member (R2), and one for
DR (listing merely R3). As there is no choice, R4 will agree upon the
existing DR/BDR.
   On the other hand, if none of the routers declares itself DR/BDR yet, R4
will run its own candidature, and take on the job.