Re: DR election
Russ White <ruwhite@CISCO.COM> Tue, 13 May 2003 11:52 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA04733 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:52:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.009BDF86@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 13 May 2003 7:55:34 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 665663 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:55:34 -0400
Received: from 64.102.124.12 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:55:34 -0400
Received: from cisco.com (uzura.cisco.com [64.102.17.77]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4DBtLmu014983 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-102-48-215.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-48-215.cisco.com [64.102.48.215]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA06819 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Tue, 13 May 2003 07:55:21 -0400 (EDT)
References: <LISTSERV%2003051306573487@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.51.0305130753280.9126@dhcp-64-102-48-215.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 07:55:39 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Russ White <ruwhite@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: DR election
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <LISTSERV%2003051306573487@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Precedence: list
As long as there is already a dr on the link, R4 would not take over as the DR. Or it shouldn't. Think of it this way: The DR isn't elected first, the BDR is. Then the routers attached to the link "discover" there is no DR, and promote the BDR to DR, and elect a new BDR. :-) Russ On Tue, 13 May 2003, Dror wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question regarding a DR election algorithm. If I have a netowrk > with 3 routers R1,-R3, each having the same priority and with router IDs > 0.0.0.1, 0.0.0.2, 0.0.0.3 respectively. > > After a DR election process is done, R3 will be DR, R2 will be BDR and R1 > will be DR-Other. This is the result of the DR election process since R3 > has the largest router ID. > > If I add a new router R4 with router ID 0.0.0.4, do I expect R4 to become > the DR, or does it just become another DR-other since there is already a DR > in the network. > > Does the result depend on whether R4 is connected to the network when it is > still in the WAIT state, or the result is the same nevertheless. > > Thanks > Dror > __________________________________ riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
- DR election Dror
- Re: DR election Igor Miroshnik
- Re: DR election Russ White
- Re: DR election Zebaida, Dror (Dror)
- Re: DR election Acee Lindem
- Re: DR election Phil Chen
- Re: DR election Zebaida, Dror (Dror)
- Re: DR election Vivek Dubey
- Re: DR election Michael J Barnes
- Re: DR election kamatchi soundaram
- Re: DR election kamatchi soundaram
- DR election Ilan Bercovich
- Re: DR election Krishnan, Vijay G.
- Re: DR election Erblichs
- Re: DR election Naresh Paliwal
- Re: DR election Acee Lindem
- Re: DR election Erblichs
- A writeup on interface state machine (Re: DR elec… Mukul Goyal
- Re: DR election Acee Lindem
- Re: A writeup on interface state machine (Re: DR … Filippo Cugini