Re: DR election

"Zebaida, Dror (Dror)" <dzebaida@AVAYA.COM> Tue, 13 May 2003 12:00 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA05404 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 13 May 2003 08:00:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <23.009BDEDD@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 13 May 2003 8:03:51 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 665753 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Tue, 13 May 2003 08:03:51 -0400
Received: from 198.152.13.101 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 13 May 2003 08:03:51 -0400
Received: from ierw.net.avaya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ierw.net.avaya.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA13132 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Tue, 13 May 2003 08:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com (h135-64-105-51.avaya.com [135.64.105.51]) by ierw.net.avaya.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA13101 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Tue, 13 May 2003 08:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thread-Topic: DR election
Thread-Index: AcMZRpJ6jri/n7mWRsaQ5+5GdIKdkwAAO1WA
Message-ID: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F02BD9BD5@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 15:03:48 +0300
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: "Zebaida, Dror (Dror)" <dzebaida@AVAYA.COM>
Subject: Re: DR election
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id IAA05404

I understand that if there is already a DR/BDR then R4 will not become the DR.
However, when an interface transitions out of the WAIT state, if it thinks it is
alone on the network, it declares itself the DR.  If after that, it connects to the
network, there are 2 routers declaring themselves DR. In our case R3 and R4.
At this stage, is a new DR elected, or does R3 remain the DR.

The scenario I am describing is R4 is conneced to the network after it transitioned
out of the WAIT state (after 40 seconds)

Thanks



-----Original Message-----
From: Russ White [mailto:ruwhite@CISCO.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 2:56 PM
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: DR election


As long as there is already a dr on the link, R4 would not take over as the
DR. Or it shouldn't. Think of it this way: The DR isn't elected first, the
BDR is. Then the routers attached to the link "discover" there is no DR,
and promote the BDR to DR, and elect a new BDR.

:-)

Russ

On Tue, 13 May 2003, Dror wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding a DR election algorithm.  If I have a netowrk
> with 3 routers R1,-R3, each having the same priority and with router IDs
> 0.0.0.1, 0.0.0.2, 0.0.0.3 respectively.
>
> After a DR election process is done, R3 will be DR, R2 will be BDR and R1
> will be DR-Other.  This is the result of the DR election process since R3
> has the largest router ID.
>
> If I add a new router R4 with router ID 0.0.0.4, do I expect R4 to become
> the DR, or does it just become another DR-other since there is already a DR
> in the network.
>
> Does the result depend on whether R4 is connected to the network when it is
> still in the WAIT state, or the result is the same nevertheless.
>
> Thanks
> Dror
>

__________________________________
riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone