[p2p-sip] __A_New_Internet-draft_is_available

[br at brianrosen.net (Brian Rosen)]

While I think this work is interesting, I believe it?s beyond what we would
consider within our first charter.  Are there people who think otherwise?

________________________________________
From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of K.Yamamoto
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:02 AM
To: Juwei Shi; Seaward Hu; p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [p2p-sip] __A_New_Internet-draft_is_available

I AGREE HIERARCHICAL MORE EASY AND DISLIKES MESS TOO.

BUT UNLESS YOU DELIBERATELY MANIPULATE EVERY MULTI-OVERLAY NODES SO THAT A
NODE CAN SAY "HEY, MY CHORD STACK DOES NOT CONNECT WITH ANOTHER CHORD NODE
ALSO IN PASTRY OVERLAY BUT CONNECT WITH THE OTHER CHORD NODE ALSO IN BT
OVERLAY", OTHERWISE AUTONOMOUS INTERCONNECTION OF MULTI-OVERLAY NODES VERY
POSSIBLY WILL FORM A CYCLIC MESH.

EXAMPLE: LETS DENOTE A NODE OF MULTI-OVERLAYS X AND Y AS XY. INTERCONNECT
NODES ABC, AC AND BC FORMS A MESH.

WHEN YOU CAN MANIPULATE NODES OF MULTIPLE OVERLAYS, WHY NOT MANIPULATE THEM
TO USE ONLY ONE OVERLAY? 

THANK YOU.
--KY
PLEASE QUALITY CONTROL LIKE BUILDING A LEXUS.
Juwei Shi <jwshi at bupt.edu.cn> wrote:
?
Yes, I agree with Seaward, hierarchically inter-connecting heterogeneous
overlays is more practical than the mesh based approach.? 
?
?
?
Interworking among heterogeneous hierarchical is more efficient than do it
meshy, you can not expect a flat huge mesh over whole world can work
reliably, the reason why mesh is used is the absence of a acceptable
standard.

Thanks.

Seaward 
?

________________________________________
From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of K.Yamamoto
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:16 AM
To: Juwei Shi; p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: ??0
2???: [p2p-sip] A New Internet-draft is available
WHEN NUMEROUS MULTI-OVERLAID NODES ARE INTERCONNECTED, "the interworking
among heterogenous overlays" IS GENERALLY MESSY NOT HIERACHICAL. 
THANK YOU.
 
--KY
PLEASE QUALITY
 CONTROL LIKE BUILDING A LEXUS.
Juwei Shi <jwshi at bupt.edu.cn> wrote: 
The NAT issues will be discussed in our future drafts. 
This draft focuses on the interworking among heterogenous overlays and the
SIP-over-P2P architecture in one single overlay is proposed by E. Shim etc. 
http://www.p2psip.org/drafts/draft-shim-sipping-p2p-arch-00.txt
Thanks
Juwei
________________________________________
????????oo: K.Yamamoto [mailto:kyara543 at yahoo.com] 
???????????????????: 2006?1??8???23????? 12:21
????????oo: Juwei Shi; p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
????????: Re: [p2p-sip] A New Internet-draft is available
THE DOCUMENT IS GORGEOUS BUT NEED RENAME AS "A MESHY ARCHITECTURE AMONG
MULTIPLE P2P-SIP NETWORKS".
FOMULA "Node-ID=Hash(Node-IP)" HAS PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE NODES BEHIND A NAT.
 
 THERE IS LITTLE ABOUT P2P OR SIP, FOR ONE SINGLE OVERLAY.
 
 THANK YOU.
 
 --KY
 PLEASE QUALITY CONTROL LIKE BUILDING A LEXUS.



Juwei Shi <jwshi at bupt.edu.cn> wrote:
Hello, all
We have
 submitted a new Internet-draft entitled a???A Hierarchical P2P-SIP
Architecturea???. This draft focuses
 on the SIP-over-P2P architecture and interworking of heterogeneous overlay
networks. 
?
This document is available in the Internet-drafts archive now:
http://www3.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shi-p2psip-hier-arch-00..txt
Comments are welcomed!
Thanks
Juwei
Juwei Shi 
Wireless Technology Innovation Institute (WTI)
Beijing Univ. of Posts and Telecommunications (BUPT)
Tel: [phone] ext. 312
Email: jwshi at bupt.edu.cn
_______________________________________________
p2p-sip mailing list
p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip
? 
________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2???/min or less.

________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2??/min or less. 

  
________________________________________
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small
Business.