IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2693212B014 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bWkL-cJWJHXS for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21BA126FDC for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 03:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPO67404; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:41:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.45) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:41:24 +0100
Received: from BLREML501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.20.5.198]) by BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:11:15 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Thread-Index: AQHR9H4PG2nLgxgOQUi/dJ04D3kM+KBM4ZUQ
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:41:15 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C932718@blreml501-mbx>
References: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.244.252]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0205.57B43F66.002F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 55f14f976ffb9b3d03d9148825ee52bf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/1fw7I3AFW5vrggRU6k-_U7ohWO4>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:41:46 -0000

Support Adoption (obviously!)

For easy reviewing, all related files can be found at Github - https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/pcep-yang.
You can also choose to provide any change request there (please also post it to the list if you do so).

Thanks! 
Dhruv


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> Sent: 12 August 2016 15:13
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear
> consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now
> need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do
> you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE
> WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not
> support the adoption.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> JP, Jon & Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email