IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 23 August 2016 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5855912D956; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1MOoFgbjbjH; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7365412D948; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n128so137133674ith.1; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Bd6W42F3DNQU//OvCkZVRuBfB+gGaChBjKTgZSqD9vw=; b=OYut7ZyjCpBs4mFzr1G0ZZVAHQcLlCmvk5xpsRC9CIAdhSjky2jaubox8G5fBp42fl g6Aulph0ioEgpLaG0TO0wH5hFDz0zEn/bn0NeLlaTW9JHZkqIKeKupuf9IRH4wDVnD8u ZIP3loY7UaHrXrja0K7OEmN5sbCOi+Svv1+nBRa6AA9ip+iFONgNjAuiGYmmcPNZlgaN WlnpZzmQb7dglcAO5j0jQWY9k+MK25HG7xxTzmmmNVZYj0AoA7kUtapFHUi7BTRnDRwa DW7XgUJLy07L0e8GpeHqTt9MQ1YiatW3JY7eVQTB6/STxk+js7gqwf27sqZlyqXzANIH UA8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Bd6W42F3DNQU//OvCkZVRuBfB+gGaChBjKTgZSqD9vw=; b=KuzagYqgT2ZfPY19+YubuPyS0mmsTZ58FnlEMg0i5k7pFRvGEaVMaZSs5VC+4uHVAO +5b1TBWb6Gkz/elnPGzZ0sJr9GA2fM6Cmf5GtAqkkFOm0j+p1ABB1J321N+xkxwVrUKo HAvbMZBmi0GMh5wfaReL66InxZyV1F4093outupN4pDBPTLyYtziviCZzPqqymA4pexH d4WvCDVG7Ww3ISVK2Br0KG3B2+ffNz7gRS1mLUKQ6QmZOSt9diusnDvH0uRKfSAueQhG tBkr+gGqKfYu8YIP3dkGbKplYTtCNxnH88ZmSbgRVbw6k5wqHlJU/hkCKWaPljpsSO+5 IJFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvahPvno867itZLxunCDLT+TdcQvzxNg0S/kgUAbZxkrp/TfVEWeUtf1FPCnb+6EptWFhMse1qE32ae6Q==
X-Received: by 10.36.3.76 with SMTP id e73mr2383987ite.42.1471961424766; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.160.137 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:10:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6eXZX0vQoFU40QX33aZM4quGov3dS=OTv8_=EmDU64XXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: julien.meuric@orange.com, pce@ietf.org, draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11419940d8b285053abdb920"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6Ko8MNFnP0eNnW4uTjDsWt8_rBU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:10:52 -0000

Yes, Support adoption of this draft as a WG document.

Thanks,
Rakesh


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:13 PM
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>


Hi all,

During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear
consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now
need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do
you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE
WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not
support the adoption.

Thanks,

JP, Jon & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email