IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0128112D7F3 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a6y3yozUZBgK for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C1DD12B005 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id pp5so38269048pac.3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A7FW8uV8pbBs67d4EVC0E4wx8RzKZgRgTtWy5F93gdw=; b=RjcgojHj0dry3ycSqIhdmXWA+7qM9rZjcAu/3LgRamxJA4F/Nbmo2xid2Rf3RJKptG Wbc5w1YucfOgMXNmTvP8RieODkrsVkRIRPObzYIka00J9TVUbJRxtIxLvYjF5YGf6I3W I/jcMRDANGRLenymkihRrvlMPQLqE+HJVgebZxpwtaXEkwopV53el0KmSoUZSum8fQ3K JVzwMw7oiJo5UVrNs7wgFj5xLOj5ZzZu7xMtGkLrw5ZHBAvcuBlLj6kCOy5uemGqkHGn PS267D5VAOGPV63nFhZ2qUCHstPAr9ARnHaG/leJZgLC2QkIN8ZEqzFnZzDGVJTmmBx8 QIkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A7FW8uV8pbBs67d4EVC0E4wx8RzKZgRgTtWy5F93gdw=; b=RHJ0I9ms7eZ0WXtGlJ8levTUI+b6S/lRZA5Ryw/zK5VblSPeNjIEBKaggvgNv5VeCw q4Mh0MREA0IvMVF3T133pROMV+2ECHsBlB1V6sr+G26G/HLf1Wt9J7dOclHYEoU1+gJ8 6hrsmtFcFieowWbRBo9YbAr/csKqxuXNhdeBWw/yxc4dl0V2P/gAyDF/qOTIYpr89RTl LEzB3n6SW9x5Mz5dkfAEYRetv9yZ9j5yk6BFWZ0s9c6xcRjSiLj+T8AUvdurnKfk4fBQ ZKNYu2dmOGKwdaRWKznaZa4Bjmbk/NWN6+liJk3Cbp0yV3SDTkJVhkgzdBVNGN6r883I DBVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv4OOsoZHGCYG73nLvrOZYbYUyL3jT/UcNK1V+v96TfFXiiCVcQr7q8YOfHb3LEdA==
X-Received: by 10.66.72.106 with SMTP id c10mr37055000pav.18.1471456950945; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.4.61.117] ([68.177.128.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a21sm48736317pfe.81.2016.08.17.11.02.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.17.0.160611
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:02:24 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <E8A764CA-54B1-4682-B50F-DE78ABC88810@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
References: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/beNS-94soHD2QD4uiHPKtepUCFE>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:02:34 -0000

Support as co-author
 
Cheers,
Jeff
 

On 8/12/16, 02:43, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" <pce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:

Hi all,

During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear 
consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now 
need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do 
you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a 
PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you 
do not support the adoption.

Thanks,

JP, Jon & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email