IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Tue, 30 August 2016 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B23F12D913 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkQU3fbl3X7R for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (usplmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84AF912D961 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-980fb98000000a08-70-57c5a4d75613
Received: from EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.87]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 40.11.02568.7D4A5C75; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:23:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC005.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:15:04 -0400
From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Thread-Index: AQHR9H39p1n4lAV4h0uaZNz/xuTCxqBhuWsA
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:15:04 +0000
Message-ID: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A8A5BB0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPuO6NJUfDDXo281v8Of2XyaLp/g12 ByaPJUt+Mnm0PDvJFsAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUx68wrloJ5bBXrrjs1ME5n7WLk4JAQMJHo WqXcxcjFISSwgVHi7I1V7BDOckaJTRt+snUxcnKwCWhIHLuzlhHEFhHQkTj//gw7iM0soCix /cAasLiwgKXEsq+vWCFqrCTOn/7IDmEbSWyff5gJxGYRUJX4uH0ZWA2vgK/E5e39YPOFBDQl VvS0g8U5BbQkLjyZD1bPKCAm8f3UGiaIXeISt6DiEgICEkv2nGeGsEUlXj7+xwphK0lMWnqO FaJeR2LB7k9sELa2xLKFr5kh9gpKnJz5hGUCo+gsJGNnIWmZhaRlFpKWBYwsqxg5SosLcnLT jQw2MQJj4ZgEm+4OxvvTPQ8xCnAwKvHwKlQcCRdiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwmu86Gi4EG9KYmVV alF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcV6xR4rhQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsapEeInD85ew3rsINfO Q0Yy5dqiy7iVF6zat9qCuVRZpdg3z2XtBAZ5noPznkdmL1Zunr6eL13u+IrvdadqNYTuMPgz Fs5QsA2tPXtMhf+q0iVxFpdje876vnDfXXnwWJpE6MPk77UL655r6XGembLLJWP1BXaLqEcO sYe+P0pcwLO/gj3kcZwSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgDyLAORgQIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/aWUqcJboKxDHQ9G-ZBM-JezP_M0>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:39:48 -0000

Support.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 5:43 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Hi all,

During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear 
consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now 
need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do 
you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a 
PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you 
do not support the adoption.

Thanks,

JP, Jon & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email