IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Fri, 12 August 2016 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9F112D0B9 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.781
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.781 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uFZAYBZO95L6 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (r-mail1.rd.orange.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4026F12B026 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 787FAA440E4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by r-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F7AA440E2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.193.71.154] (10.193.71.154) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:43:24 +0200
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:43:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/WXJOOBk5q4sg0hKbsYUR9QutX3w>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:43:27 -0000

Hi all,

During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear 
consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now 
need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do 
you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a 
PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you 
do not support the adoption.

Thanks,

JP, Jon & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email