IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Mon, 05 September 2016 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BB112B208 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 06:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-iymdUPy-96 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 06:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BD512B204 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 06:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0119C7CC005 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:44:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF087CC004 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:44:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.193.71.130] (10.193.71.130) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:44:27 +0200
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <03332021-01e1-c5c4-1a0a-97e76872bd60@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 15:44:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/9dgJt-U_4Ys09butPMSvYjk_sjI>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:44:30 -0000

Hi,

We have consensus to adopt. Authors, please republish under the name 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-00.

Thanks,

Jon, JP & Julien


Aug. 12, 2016 - Julien Meuric:
> Hi all,
>
> During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear 
> consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We 
> now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a 
> result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right 
> foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, 
> especially if you do not support the adoption.
>
> Thanks,
>
> JP, Jon & Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email