IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 26 August 2016 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A700512D5BC for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jPQWIwPVjf9b for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA00A12D0A5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m60so89641458uam.3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XhUjTXjCoin6DECJIGLIXdwk0vTBTBtyZV3ZvYzQc58=; b=i1Tx+7fUT2Mthd8hSrahE50Y4AgOhQurXeqdjT4ZIpbfLyLwpAdIYJq7IKGOfPXEzM L7+RrWxtG8XKqwKuutlTIlXvLoLjjp/6OyyZb6i37z4g0LA3F/XZOZ7vFHJGcgHhduxs 0xqeZWgEZ8ACvZasSp4E+bqg2WKruoXGc6A0zx596/+mz453MRC2c2TTuUSKkcQNRP6E nQCs4aOOX3hpgRwY0NRQ9QOUPtuGpdiY2WKF8W8SO6X+kwOeP7zM5cVZOt+Bd67qzJde UY9hTWKIGeEdILHV1M0AaYabsfhtyyfCc/6W3+9eMwuYmlw6dYOb8HUfn3MHhRv271wh uIJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XhUjTXjCoin6DECJIGLIXdwk0vTBTBtyZV3ZvYzQc58=; b=LmChxfedADzQyeGqhps3p7UGqzmUu5QoGn9ZZ1He1DwZ0WSQ62bLQ9TsXFCpDrSZ55 /hmMcYUrwI2JDpjYcDYsFcShHl6oCz3g2oyAXL5pt5EZzSei6QeQumPUssgVlcb04mrH 8M3n4zGMCJd0ytbjU7WkkX1UB6A3kkFjtF2bMNawJ7CTtQdsgiPz2XzqYk8DrAaGVqZF PQgc3RRWgi3cKmU2X1F4QzLzNJi7Li1Hq1WHf1r5KuEEnCGoWhPMtk02pU4wAws6EMln Y8uf1J9za8GzGEPKXQuS94S+sitOybVccjD2zEn+d1Q3sUBBAEdWGyJBO5h1nmTSLaPM Tr5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwP93RezOPSOUIuSwc+xG1Z59m02TvkU9Udh+QFJDQWZSmjc52IrxDIuToJ5Um4zClegeJrPl0H3OpiNwQ==
X-Received: by 10.159.40.71 with SMTP id c65mr1406079uac.1.1472206467035; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.48.131 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
References: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:14:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuCbO3zL1=m1Y-AfDfd1qoiS73iA0G2_q7MMyY43sF3nQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c047d3e80fea0053af6c76a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/JmXM19AwMJnLSFpM0BR8HuLcv1c>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:14:29 -0000

Support.

-Pavan

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear
> consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now
> need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do
> you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE
> WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not
> support the adoption.
>
> Thanks,
>
> JP, Jon & Julien
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email