Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 18 August 2016 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA01912B04B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sVilsbalVhXR for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275DD12B00F for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CPP57571; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:19:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 02:18:59 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.179]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:18:54 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Thread-Index: AQHR9H4OR18OK0xA/0+DrIXHQ0GGG6BN8+kw
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:18:54 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA853B1B82@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <57AD9A3C.2050300@orange.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.65]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090203.57B50D04.003F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.179, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 55f14f976ffb9b3d03d9148825ee52bf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/lnXZTmQpsnpoWVcA8aCYYZvL_00>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:19:04 -0000

Support.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric
发送时间: 2016年8月12日 17:43
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06

Hi all,

During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption.

Thanks,

JP, Jon & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce