Re: [PEPPERMINT] DRINKS PROPOSED Charter ..comments please.

>  
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Richard Shockey [mailto:richard@shockey.us]
>  >
>  > No one is proposing a solution. We are describing  that we do not
>  propose
>  > exchanging data on Collateralized Debt Instruments and Mortgage
>  Interest
>  > Swaps among SSP's
>  
>  Sure, I'm all in favor of getting a charter approved post-haste.  Even
>  if it means my ideas for "Mortgage Interest eXchanges" (MIX) will have
>  to wait for a charter update.  (too bad too, 'cause a draft-drinks-mix
>  would have been a recipe for success in my opinion)

Good very good ... cant wait to see the draft ..

>  
>  But seriously, how "detailed" do we need to be in the charter
>  regarding this data?  I think Daryl's proposed data with some minor
>  nits is broad enough not to cause heartburn later, while not letting
>  us get drunk in the possibilities. :)
>  
>  How about this:
>  
>  [begin]
>  The scope will be limited to defining the following criteria necessary
>  for a SSP to respond with the necessary Session Establishment Data
>  (SED) for both internal and external purposes:
>  
>          + Routes
>                  - Destination SIP/SIPS/TEL URI Egress and Ingress
>  Routes
>                  - Relevant route names, identifiers, and services
>                  - Attributes affecting route selection
>          + Service Areas
>                  - Individual, ranges, or groups of user-agent
>  identifiers
>                  - Route-to-service-area associations
>          + Treatment Profiles
>                  - Priority
>                  - Location
>  
>  The mechanism(s) chosen should be extensible, in case additional
>  criteria are deemed necessary to achieve the goals of the WG in the
>  future.
>  [end]

And I'll add the sentence on or rating and billing data.

Works for me ...

>  
>  -hadriel

_______________________________________________
PEPPERMINT mailing list
PEPPERMINT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint