Re: [PEPPERMINT] DRINKS PROPOSED Charter ..comments please.

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Wed, 16 April 2008 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <peppermint-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: peppermint-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-peppermint-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716CB3A6C0B; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: peppermint@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: peppermint@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683F328C179 for <peppermint@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.238, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUpZMXcUJ2KP for <peppermint@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2344A3A6C9D for <peppermint@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.263.0; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:46:52 -0400
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([216.41.24.7]) by mail.acmepacket.com ([216.41.24.7]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:05:33 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, "peppermint@ietf.org" <peppermint@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:06:47 -0400
Thread-Topic: [PEPPERMINT] DRINKS PROPOSED Charter ..comments please.
Thread-Index: Acif5hOzmNYlp/X0SiGV1jnC6pF21gABRFUA
Message-ID: <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC30BD017FCA3@mail.acmepacket.com>
References: <125b01c89fe6$14f823c0$3ee86b40$@us>
In-Reply-To: <125b01c89fe6$14f823c0$3ee86b40$@us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PEPPERMINT] DRINKS PROPOSED Charter ..comments please.
X-BeenThere: peppermint@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Provisioning Extensions in Peering Registries for Multimedia INTerconnection <peppermint.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint>, <mailto:peppermint-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/peppermint>
List-Post: <mailto:peppermint@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:peppermint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint>, <mailto:peppermint-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: peppermint-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:peppermint-bounces@ietf.org] On
> ************************
> DRINKS Proposed Charter
> Data for Reachability of Inter/tra-NetworK SIP
> Current Status: Proposed Working Group
>
> Mailing Lists:
> peppermint@ietf.org

We'll need a new mailing list name (or alias) for drinks@ietf.org. :)


> General information about the mailing list is at:
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint
>
>
> Area Directorate: Real Time Applications (RAI)
> RAI Director(s):
> Jon Peterson jon.peterson@neustar.biz
> Cullen Jennings fluffy@cisco.com
> Chairs: TBD
>
> PROPOSED CHARTER FOR PEPPERMINT
>
> The IETF has been working on various aspects of SIP-enabled Multimedia
> administrative domains among SIP Service Providers (SSPs. SSP's are

Typo: "(SSPs" should be "(SSPs)".


> entities
> that provide session services utilizing SIP signaling to their customers.
> In
> addition, the IETF has done significant work on data exchanges among
> various
> network elements.
>
> The ENUM and SPEERMINT working groups provide the underlying context for
> much of the intended work that the DRINKS working group will undertake.:

Remove last period, or last colon.


> The ENUM working group is specifically chartered to develop protocols that
> involve the translation of E.164 numbers to URIs.  While the SPEERMINT
> working group has been chartered to develop requirements and best current
> practices among real-time application SSPs and to describe how such
> services
> may best interconnect across administrative boundaries.
>
> More specifically, SPEERMINT will provide details of how Session
> Establishment Data (SED) is collected, what comprises SED, how SED should
> be
> used to properly identify an optimal path to a destination SIP user agent
> (UA), and the secure manners in which SED and the SIP session data is
> exchanged between the peering functions.
>
> It is also recognized that peering relationships become more complex as
> multiple peers are added to a common relationship; these complex aspects
> and
> requirements are defined within the contexts of a peering Federation.
>
> The DRINKS working group is chartered with a scope that is orthogonal to
> SPEERMINT and ENUM.  The protocol work OF DRINKS will be designed to build
> from the work of SPEERMINT and ENUM to identify and define the data
> structures and data exchange protocol(s) among SIP based Multimedia
> administrative domains.
>
> These administrative domains may be of any practical size and could be any
> type of SSP, such as recognized telephony carriers, enterprises, end-user
> groups, or Federations.  Data exchanges among these administrative domains
> may be bi-lateral or multi-lateral in nature, and could include bulk
> updates
> and/or more granular real-time updates.
>
> Typical data includes the mapping of phone numbers to URIs, policies
> surrounding admission to various points of network interconnection, and
> various other types of interconnect data.  In addition, there is a
> specific
> need for the exchange of such data between the Registry and various types
> of
> PSTN network databases.

Is there only one Registry? ;)  Change "the Registry" to "a Registry".


> The working group will draw upon expert advice and on-going consultation
> from the ENUM and SPEERMINT working groups, and also the XML Directorate.
> The working group will consider the reuse of elements of RFC 4114.
>
> The final work product(s) from this working group will utilize and be
> based
> on XML documents and XML document exchanges.
>
>
>
> PROPOSED GOALS AND MILESTONES
>
>
> Requirements for Session Establishment Data (SED) data exchanges.
> Sept 08
>
> Provisioning of Session Establishment Data (SED) registries.
> Nov 08

I think you mean "Data model of SED Registries"? (I'm not really quite sure what this milestone is?)

> Provisioning of Localized Session Establishment Data (SED) caches.

I think you mean "Exchanging Session Establishment Data (SED) between Lookup Function or Location Routing Function Databases."

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
PEPPERMINT mailing list
PEPPERMINT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/peppermint