Re: [Pesci-discuss] For whom it may concern..

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> If you get a proposal that solves a specific problem/"pain point", that 
> matters, we already have enough BCPs to actually DO something as a process 
> experiment. Not saying that we don't need process evolution, just saying that 
> we don't have to do process evolution before anything can get better.

We already have a lot of those.  John Klensin's review team; Harald's 
two-level.  Alex Zinin's early review.  Maybe others I forgot.

It's not the lack of specific proposals on a specific problem space, 
it's the lack of follow-through.

Based on what I've seen,
  - it's not realistic to assume that the IESG will drive forward such 
a proposal, and
  - it's not realistic to assume the author of such a proposal would 
drive it through all by him/herself.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Pesci-discuss mailing list
Pesci-discuss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pesci-discuss