IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Logotypes in certificates

Stefan Santesson <stefan@addtrust.com> Wed, 04 April 2001 20:35 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com ([208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA01140 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA27582; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.imc.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:33:24 -0700
Received: from exafix.addtrust.com ([212.112.175.83]) by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27525 for <ietf-pkix@imc.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from santesson.addtrust.com ([62.20.231.85]) by exafix.addtrust.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:32:13 +0200
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010404222714.02a978b8@mail.addtrust.com>
X-Sender: sts@mail.addtrust.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 22:33:35 +0200
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
From: Stefan Santesson <stefan@addtrust.com>
Subject: RE: Logotypes in certificates
Cc: ietf-pkix@imc.org
In-Reply-To: <p05010400b6ef9022503a@[128.33.4.39]>
References: <5.0.0.25.2.20010402222124.033fbc38@mail.addtrust.com> <5.0.0.25.2.20010322185247.0420d990@mail.addtrust.com> < <D44EACB40164D311BEF00090274EDCCA1E740A@sydneymail1.zergo.com.au> <D44EACB40164D311BEF00090274EDCCA1E740A@sydneymail1.zergo.com.au> <5.0.0.25.2.20010322185247.0420d990@mail.addtrust.com> <5.0.0.25.2.20010402222124.033fbc38@mail.addtrust.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2001 20:32:14.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[55586270:01C0BD46]
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe

Steve,

At 10:43 2001-04-03 -0400, Stephen Kent wrote:
>I learned long ago that it's often a bad idea to agree to a concept 
>irrespective of a proposed means of achieving it. So, absent a concrete 
>proposal for HOW, I don't think we have consensus on WHETHER to pursue 
>this work item.  That's why I proposed that you, as the prime mover behind 
>the idea, develop a comprehensive proposal for what you are trying to 
>achieve and how you propose to achieve it. if you can't find the time to 
>do that, then we will not pursue it.

Well I will do my homework, including investigating other ways and foras to 
pursue this. If there is enough interest and consensus and if there is a 
general understanding that PKIX is the right place, then I will make sure 
that the material you ask for will be presented to the list.

/Stefan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email