Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5tuple routing (#3536)

ianswett <> Tue, 28 April 2020 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3003A0926 for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BXekhrGan-Qm for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9623A0924 for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E511E004E for <>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1588116511; bh=xWagzmlrDHu3bByeoD4JmAcFANznD+4pZtheijvSAfU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=wW6c2iM1eJ9TCTX+9jFTvt65tIhcL0Pm8oTpHcupeVH6TJ4wp8WxUB2hQFPrAdrXX JFs+H98anoiCt3dsgmw7qTHQFLWMhBsN9ewNI4OMRKWkA3elBlERgbPwxhZnLbiv3y BS2ZrayywvpFuYYy/AxdFReR1fgEKOCF4WBKVOGI=
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:28:31 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3536/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5tuple routing (#3536)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ea8bc1f6d4f7_8c83ffab6ecd95c21228f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:28:34 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -1156,6 +1156,31 @@ SHOULD ignore any such packets.
 Servers MUST drop incoming packets under all other circumstances.
+### Considerations for simple load balancers
+A server deployment could load balance among servers using simply source and
+destination IP addresses and ports. Changes to the client's IP address or port
+could result in packets being forwarded to the wrong server. Such a server
+deployment could use one of the following methods to for connection continuity

deployment could use one of the following methods for connection continuity

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: