Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5tuple routing (#3536)

Mike Bishop <> Wed, 29 April 2020 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A473A00C9 for <>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZZSIu8R0bTR for <>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 902183A005B for <>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC03FA06CD for <>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1588175739; bh=c11oPhF96vGpXabHi2C/DWSTUr695OxFEgQaRpu9wM0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pCVK5YV+fUug1Fm5hlmp7PrYPLitU3Scc+InKkseanDVwoGKEYlRPB5lvfPO93tuA VDQK6FIzxsoB7h8JMGC1K7mtavuAG+wY8VSyo9KCd4/8VfTOlmBb+mjAKMKM7JxUi1 LBQsX8JSjcd1s9Mq8UX49/4N2LrOZe2YZQf5RCCk=
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:55:39 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3536/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5tuple routing (#3536)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ea9a37b9cb71_3ad13fc0b6ecd9641979656"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:55:43 -0000

@MikeBishop approved this pull request.

> +* If servers can use other dedicated server IP addresses or ports than
+the one that the client is initiating connections to, they could use the
+preferred_address transport parameter to request that clients move
+connections to these dedicated addresses. Note that clients could
+choose not to use the preferred address.

Isn't the whole point of this section that the address/port initially used by the client _isn't_ dedicated to this particular server?  It seems like the entire "other than... connects to" phrase is unnecessary.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: