Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5tuple routing (#3536)

[ianswett <[e-mail]>]

@ianswett commented on this pull request.

Some more editorial comments.

> @@ -1156,6 +1156,30 @@ SHOULD ignore any such packets.
 
 Servers MUST drop incoming packets under all other circumstances.
 
+### Considerations for simple load balancers
+
+A server farm could be deployed behind a simple load balancer that routes

```suggestion
Servers could be deployed behind a simple load balancer that routes
```

> +* Servers could use an out-of-band mechanism to forward packets or connection
+state to the correct endpoint.

```suggestion
* Servers could use an out-of-band mechanism to forward packets to the correct server based
on Connection ID.
```

> +If a server behind such a load balancer does not implement a solution to
+maintain connection continuity SHOULD disallow connection migration
+via the disable_active_migration transport parameter.

```suggestion
Servers behind load balancers that do not implement a solution to
maintain connection continuity SHOULD disallow connection migration
via the disable_active_migration transport parameter.
```

> +following methods to for connection continuity when a client's address changes.
+
+* Servers could use an out-of-band mechanism to forward packets or connection
+state to the correct endpoint.
+
+* If the server deployment can use other non-load-balanced server IP
+addresses or ports than the one that the client is initiating connections on,
+servers could use the preferred_address transport parameter to request
+that clients move to these server addresses. Note that clients could choose
+not to use the preferred address.
+
+If a server behind such a load balancer does not implement a solution to
+maintain connection continuity SHOULD disallow connection migration
+via the disable_active_migration transport parameter.
+
+Server deployments that use such load balancing might still allow for

```suggestion
Server deployments that use such load balancing might allow for
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3536#pullrequestreview-402271809