Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A746112D4E7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:25:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3pDn68LkHoJX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC16126BED for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 19:25:41 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543548341; bh=ys97Ip8hlu3wz5bMZ6wpqN6t+1ByrgOSgVZZjVTr4o4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=uqmdgAq8CuhGG2mu+dQqA7XNzj0/9bVpUsvGF7BDcb9yoIx8/4gjK7Y3lsTPMnDDA RtI0BH+5zUCqru5B71wqdghkXi7D4PvtiUrEZ57G7tneyQyycFowTLo4ORHDGfBQGA 3l9fukYLZdo0PcNAjMmReEz4zlQabPaUm2C5gktQ=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab2e12d0ad686888bc1c47ee0f1fcc2653758782ea92cf0000000118186fb592a169ce16f4226e@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060/443078394@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] compensation of ack_delay is fragile against errors (#2060)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c00adb543e18_4b6d3fa5a74d45b871129"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0KAQPZsZeIhNbhCCTeSfeSGyeOM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 03:25:44 -0000

@ianswett : I agree that we compromised. I was just noting that the ideal solution might be to use an EWMA perhaps, but we're settling for simplicity right now. That has a cost... and these corner cases are that cost I think.

I'm tempted to suggest that we simply drop samples where the ack_delay does not make sense. This should not be the common case anyways.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2060#issuecomment-443078394