Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] lost_pn can no longer be negative (#2621)

ianswett <> Mon, 15 April 2019 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD64120243 for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ek3zG80XdWdK for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC46A120192 for <>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:39:12 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1555364352; bh=JAUsxnxJ1utbYKnFHzZYezJM2K0zLlJ/AAfqKtL6P7Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=HXTkGtJYFWdKneE9XUXn01qhcXkFqCK16EqhzSIJNMZmKYh2IG9hCreHYteyL9BAw 6VO4cDcvIeqZPijiS+3mBPpf+6DFtaj3MAW2t0gvOeOhmOtiphfd84P179zC4y5KeV 9c25WBv/BFBdAIX2qJX368NSEaZgimTNECGtS4Ow=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2621/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] lost_pn can no longer be negative (#2621)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb4fa00cee5a_246d3fec788d45c4909d0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:39:15 -0000

I'll note that infinite is not a valid unsigned integer either, so I'm increasingly not in love with the complexity this causes vs just using signed integers.  QUIC only supports 62 bit ints on the wire, so signed integers are not an implementation burden.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: