Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] disable_active_migration with SPA (#3765)

Kazuho Oku <> Mon, 15 June 2020 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3393A11E1 for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_1rPUQLvpoE for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9FB3A11DF for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833988C06E1 for <>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1592256550; bh=KPcOktpwpYm58qc2H01UsSp8GEbMfrU3KfdjahJUMU4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QMvnjxJuwxt+zlVGnQZd4I6P1ZIpIlA9KzTkySoXu1imP4mPp2EUQljk5v9SsX7Ds KGTEG9OVezU8UbY5Hc46spuaZaYM6GuexGVw7nhnvsjVeE5ew0AN75yRztGnABbwhb EdwZFCAIpgbouCB/tSHFvSNe48JNvRwWfUXscWH0=
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:29:10 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3765/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] disable_active_migration with SPA (#3765)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ee7e82673913_5b6b3f9dcd0cd960200187"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:29:13 -0000

>> it is my understanding that a client is allowed (and have to be allowed) to use any source tuple when migrating to SPA.
> This is the consequence of #3608 (#3670), which breaks the deployment scenario in this issue. (It used to be handled ok before.)

I disagree. Since the earlier versions of the draft, a client has been allowed to use a different address, when migrating to SPA. A prominent example is a client switching to a different IP protocol (i.e. from v4 to v6, or vice versa).

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: