Re: Proposed Charter Text

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

(speaking as the draft author) In my opinion, the QUIC-LB work is a natural
extension of the ops and manageability draft rather than a genuine
extension of the WG scope. Nevertheless I have no objection to adding the
text to the charter.

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:43 AM Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 14:23 -0800, Jana Iyengar wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if solution is much better than mechanism. I believe what
> we
> > > agreed to is to provide guidance. Maybe we can just write that in the
> > > charter:
> > >
> > >  Additionally, the Working Group will provide guidance to support load
> > > balancers in handling of QUIC traffic.
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
>
> I find the english a bit strange. Wouldn't this be better from an english
> perspective?
>
> Additionally, the Working Group will provide guidance on how to enable load
> balancers to handle QUIC traffic.
>
>
> This is actually based on that the document proposals scheme defines how
> endpoints should generate and structure CIDs to enable the load balancers
> to
> route based on the CID.
>
> Any additional feedback on this?
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Networks, Ericsson Research
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                 | Phone  [phone]
> Torshamnsgatan 23           | Mobile [phone]
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>