Re: [radext] Adoption call for draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-06

["Sanchez, Mauricio" <[e-mail]>]

Now that the the Perez, et.al. draft has made it into WG draft status we
see that discussion turned to what the scope of solution should be.  Can
the authors of the draft summarize their current understanding of the
situation and what their suggested/planned next steps are?  I expect that
one or more of the authors will be at IETF 88 to add this draft to the
agenda, so please confirm availability.

As a reminder, we are on the 1st day (Monday) at 1300.

-Mauricio & Jouni 





On 8/26/13 12:35 AM, "Jouni Korhonen" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
>Folks,
>
>We got some support and none going against the adoption. There were
>already some very detailed discussion on aspects people want to see
>changed in the document, which is a really good start.
>
>We will take draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-06 as the _basis_
>for the WG solution. Now the WG needs to come up with text that everybody
>agrees with. whether we need further documents on fragmentation, e.g. as
>a generic long term solution is to be seen and discussed.
>
>- Jouni & Mauricio
>
>
>On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Jouni Korhonen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>> 
>> Based on the discussion in Berlin we are ready to start another
>> adoption call for the solution for fragmentation of RADIUS packets.
>> 
>> This email starts a two week consensus call on adopting:
>> 
>> Filename:         draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation
>> Revision:         06
>> Title:            Support of fragmentation of RADIUS packets
>> Creation date:    2013-07-02
>> 
>> Express your concerns or support by 23rd August EOB on the mailing list.
>> 
>> - Jouni & Mauricio
>
>_______________________________________________
>radext mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext