IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [radext] Adoption call for draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-06

Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@painless-security.com>
X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4098F21F9E5E for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o83hrFiJQW4w for <radext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D90521F9CC2 for <radext@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 15:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1558C2031B; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:48:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4lk4cnshV530; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:48:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-136-31-107.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.136.31.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:48:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id C444087FAC; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:48:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@painless-security.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni@gmail.com>
References: <86D0772B-4561-46BD-950D-AF95BED87292@gmail.com> <B4870ECE-1D3F-45C6-A080-8936A8045B6E@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:48:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <B4870ECE-1D3F-45C6-A080-8936A8045B6E@gmail.com> (Jouni Korhonen's message of "Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:35:56 +0300")
Message-ID: <tslhae17c9l.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "radext@ietf.org" <radext@ietf.org>, radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org" <draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption call for draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-06
X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list <radext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/radext>
List-Post: <mailto:radext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext>, <mailto:radext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 22:48:18 -0000

>>>>> "Jouni" == Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> writes:

    Jouni> Folks,

    Jouni> We will take draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-06 as
    Jouni> the _basis_ for the WG solution

Hi.
I'd be happy if you reword that sentence as "_a_ _basis_ for _a_ WG
solution."

I think there was significant support for the idea that this draft alone
is insufficient and that we want to revisit the RADIUS message size over
TCP.
I do not believe the discussion supports the idea that this draft will
be a singular solution.
So, I'd ask the chairs to clarify.

--Sam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email