IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Conex charter - now in External Review

"Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com> Thu, 29 April 2010 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <richard_woundy@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11B93A6A4F for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.929, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62H1FsJ1JmDO for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC72F3A6A24 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([10.52.116.30]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 5503620.78471599; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:25:37 -0400
Received: from pacdcexcmb05.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.116]) by PAOAKEXCSMTP01.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:25:37 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:24:47 -0400
Message-ID: <EE00404438E9444D90AEA84210DC4067A3740C@pacdcexcmb05.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <68FC2CFB-2F16-4B2C-8DA8-D8EED6DC81FC@g11.org.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Conex charter - now in External Review
Thread-Index: AcrnICMMVHjlLwrkS067UoCJR4luYgAIuVSg
References: <4BD6F2DD.3040202@cisco.com> <20100427151601.GF16203@verdi> <EE00404438E9444D90AEA84210DC406793D9DB@pacdcexcmb05.cable.comcast.com> <A8B8C5AF-37C2-4DD6-BDDB-760FC616BE8F@g11.org.uk> <EE00404438E9444D90AEA84210DC406793DC75@pacdcexcmb05.cable.comcast.com> <20100428152122.GB14169@verdi> <68FC2CFB-2F16-4B2C-8DA8-D8EED6DC81FC@g11.org.uk>
From: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>, John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2010 02:25:37.0133 (UTC) FILETIME=[40E931D0:01CAE743]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Conex charter - now in External Review
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:25:58 -0000

> let's cut him some slack, please.

Fair enough... I will cut Stewart some slack as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: ken carlberg [mailto:carlberg@g11.org.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:14 PM
To: John Leslie
Cc: Woundy, Richard; Stewart Bryant; re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Conex charter - now in External Review


On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:21 AM, John Leslie wrote:

>   In the past, Lars has asked other IESG members to put their concerns
> in writing. It is reasonable to assume Stewart is responding to such
> a request. Please recall, Stewart is a new IESG member, and may not be
> familiar with all the history we would like him to be -- i.e. let's
> cut him some slack, please.

I quite agree about cutting the fellow a lot of slack.  And I'll
respectfully extend my apologies if my earlier response was considered
too abrupt....its always hard to convey proper tone over email.

I deeply appreciate Stewart speaking up on the matter on the list.  And
whether the proper response to the business oriented questions are "it
doesn't matter" or "its out of scope" is possibly splitting hairs.  I
just feel strongly that a measure of consistency approach taken by all.

as for the MPLS question, I thought that Bob Briscoe had responded to
that question at the Anaheim meeting.  And if so, perhaps he could
reiterate it on the list.

cheers,

-ken

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email