Re: [re-ECN] Conex charter - now in External Review

[Leslie Daigle <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

This isn't completely responsive to your questions, but I think it helps 
characterize it:  Bob Briscoe compiled this information from this 
mailing list at the time of the first BoF:


2 have implemented
10 promised implementation effort
16 co-authorship
12 contribute effort
14 reviewing
6 protocol design
6 deployment cases
6 trials/testbeds
13 build uses of ConEx
10 analysis/evaluation
23 just support

60% com
40% gov/org/edu


I'd like to highlight something I said in Anaheim:    The intended 
purpose of CONEX is to develop a generative technology: building blocks 
to allow more sophisticated and network-sensitive congestion management 
than is possible with the data available to nodes today.   It does make 
a challenge for determining "deployability".  ISPs will deploy 
solutions, not technology, so "deploy CONEX?" is a very remote and 
challenging question.  And also a very different question than whether 
there is interest and purpose in pursuing it in the IETF.

Leslie.





Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Is there a list of service providers that have stated that they wish to 
> deploy CONEX technology?
> 
> Similarly is there a list of service providers that have stated that 
> they do not wish to deploy CONEX technology?
> 
> Do we know which members of the list that wish to deploy the technology 
> need to deploy it over an IP network and which need to deploy it over an 
> MPLS enabled network?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Stewart
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
      Yours to discover."
                                 -- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
[e-mail]
-------------------------------------------------------------------