IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] archiving outlinks in RFCs

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 26 April 2023 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8356CC14CE2C for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TS6KMMTPyqRE for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E7CC14CE4F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCC038994; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VxCXBMdhvLA4; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CB03898E; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1682530244; bh=r0IlGtp4ns90QZfHaLuo7rSfO6Fg8HUqnGmc1uZiBTc=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Yk0eHOh1wzuAmruPCTGKqAcMhkuPnXhEVyVA2PvmM1Fq9Aiw6U6BjQbTs1STyyTgR zfI/MnzshvH9nRm1dxHvaGkM49m5CI6SO9fsyG/UA+bv2F16ujN/QTPkizTuwWPNnb 5ECJwVWF+FAnMeMrN4chWN9tVZteCDhKlCWRNWsFrYaQ4FFIcG92vJWR6GLZihGQp9 bPCtVQQ/YW4D87hyz5+9yhvQDqQPvsNEPhQJSHNu+PdqsIRdranIjCiqnJNhugaGlS fQByB8y7XxQhFoFjNBf+e//NCI3xLLZ607lAfgT1HlaBDHtUe1jGJi6kxX0I4gVBB3 TRukxxTcV1Ybw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC21755; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:12:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
In-Reply-To: <A29F2C61-CFD2-44DB-A5D1-73AC0D9F40B5@ietf.org>
References: <E024D9AC-2B92-4720-9713-519592D2362B@rfc-editor.org> <30c30c2f-4e96-560a-73dd-a51ba8d04714@comcast.net> <771B7586-FFBB-49E4-9B99-5578863FBD8B@rfc-editor.org> <CABcZeBOevOj8cWY7dacWxzwZS82+iAjf1p+DZWF=7WZ9JydnrQ@mail.gmail.com> <A29F2C61-CFD2-44DB-A5D1-73AC0D9F40B5@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:12:49 -0400
Message-ID: <996.1682529169@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/46IL1KMde4QZCqjtCVht0KDovd8>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] archiving outlinks in RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 17:12:57 -0000

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:
    > If however the format was changed so that clicking on the link brought
    > up a box with further links to both the original and the archived link
    > so that people could choose then i don’t think that requires an RSWG
    > decision.

I really like this option.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email