Re: [rfc-i] archiving outlinks in RFCs

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 26 April 2023 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2E5C15154F for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2RkK5-DhLKBa for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10C81C14CE2C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-64115e652eeso567564b3a.0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682546873; x=1685138873; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=M5bgvmVV5vUBBiAuLUXpKFmSrP051GAK3xFOzMIvAUQ=; b=UY5RES0nKrOxQQC6yKAjR9NfwkfbKQtLHQgKjFVLRHW2z4PHvKoeINz0sRIn7KD6Xu ahYHHyYhHIG+KlY8yrky+6hECpKmoVmNxCploxWMFreFZVcH2zMuCei1sodpPYlJMCLw Y2Nm2JkSpHnzMVhOGe1dP2CGl6hJaD7cUVZs/TDv5wuj4+MzZAuTodVrn5bTSCJ8j2zf UX59hQ/qLwDCoMBG/LUgpnSA2hQ0uPhhlg1mbzc2PTn0/7j30RdD5fDcW4X4rx+t6ADr oSsdxXMufZwIeUaffa4uqnoEu8choP013YBKSRGQG3ipx9apXqKqMA78MsNjTb1+JyPa 6UVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682546873; x=1685138873; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=M5bgvmVV5vUBBiAuLUXpKFmSrP051GAK3xFOzMIvAUQ=; b=DGw2SdhkiQxca0xBaSQk7+M+DSbFrWQvmEwu6acCkhSIH0RaxF4hgDWtUArbH2Ix1+ og7WqXZN/+JCYcCXnTvA1cFzkdJn1QyDEbnC76iOcvyMvkVPGNtc6aU4O7Uqs8FCQA7B yOBhG311ISeEc6zSHflJkh5xxN26GVTtapkutHGEnqa35I1bSpWtgJqqdmlL2+QUN+AF ptN5m0ZMGLxHPRKheziOQW9pje4lv+itjlCXAVHJnmrGsuKeNoAWyxZ/Zr6SdLoHCBU7 gN6zzE1epZ43yUZchaWhn32c3Gnd4JLgkqxeo9ICPo5BLW+oaodTRQM5PvyAaK5GTsXj vsow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxyPcfBGi0gxInHb8OTQ7EVZItb7vRVn3183TdY2gjjYTvfxH4p sysdHO3A6C1ptou1cygTJJf3pUpFRr4dbw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5RjcjKqMZ848uEYpyNxf4SvprAOpUA3nDaxGV8Vv1fkRXVt7XY2vknHQ2D5a5ZowUc3MXxDg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:78a0:b0:f2:1c13:95a4 with SMTP id bf32-20020a056a2178a000b000f21c1395a4mr4472356pzc.27.1682546873508; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2406:e003:1184:f001:abb6:ea4f:cf8e:1d0d? ([2406:e003:1184:f001:abb6:ea4f:cf8e:1d0d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o70-20020a62cd49000000b0062dcf5c01f9sm11709056pfg.36.2023.04.26.15.07.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1980857a-50c1-1d6d-8ec2-5bb496f52827@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:07:47 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <E024D9AC-2B92-4720-9713-519592D2362B@rfc-editor.org> <30c30c2f-4e96-560a-73dd-a51ba8d04714@comcast.net> <771B7586-FFBB-49E4-9B99-5578863FBD8B@rfc-editor.org> <CABcZeBOevOj8cWY7dacWxzwZS82+iAjf1p+DZWF=7WZ9JydnrQ@mail.gmail.com> <A29F2C61-CFD2-44DB-A5D1-73AC0D9F40B5@ietf.org> <996.1682529169@localhost> <CAKq15vfOTRserb1zcuJeT3BvJRSZX3Umvzt8UNPSb9+GdnrFRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKq15vfOTRserb1zcuJeT3BvJRSZX3Umvzt8UNPSb9+GdnrFRg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/GUqPxdRGHV3_8H9_l8M8nvCKeSU>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] archiving outlinks in RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 22:07:58 -0000

Larry,

How does that help if the content is now 404 or behind a paywall?

Regards
    Brian

On 27-Apr-23 06:27, Larry Masinter wrote:
> If you want a permanent URI that will outlast the lifetime of https://archive.org <https://archive.org>, use a "dated uri": (duri:2023:...)
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10>
> 
> Or, if you want to point to the document described by a landing page, you can use tdb:.
> 
> archive.org <http://archive.org> would be a good candidate to participate in the resolution of such URIs
> 
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:13 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr%2Bietf@sandelman.ca>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org <mailto:exec-director@ietf.org>> wrote:
>          > If however the format was changed so that clicking on the link brought
>          > up a box with further links to both the original and the archived link
>          > so that people could choose then i don’t think that requires an RSWG
>          > decision.
> 
>     I really like this option.
> 
>     --
>     Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca <mailto:mcr%2BIETF@sandelman.ca>>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>                 Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     rfc-interest mailing list
>     rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
>     https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> https://LarryMasinter.net <https://LarryMasinter.net> https://interlisp.org <https://interlisp.org>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest