IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] archiving outlinks in RFCs

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 26 April 2023 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C661C1519BC for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b="mN2b9mot"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="VfHxHgzu"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id thrvJ7du0vdr for <rfc-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7958C14CEFC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4783200941; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:17:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:17:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1682468271; x= 1682554671; bh=r+5aubD/Xe0m6azTCFwAC6cOt5tQ0EUVuwp2TQCWTVw=; b=m N2b9mot10Mtv+0wrhUejgecPIBPffzvIEzXmo8BKGZ0AOfcGLR3jf5gqC5B96kvh ZRxnci08ofkkfMR986kCo9vN1YZ/Fdc4Z/a1GtxD43pV1+DKB2j1De07Okq8WrZJ bOEDf4ziRTS6m0BLPQLuLVp6974TfF6DaoaRtthO3b8B46ydCO1puNdELJVwui9i Xgq7KTqa6w0qv6JBRPS7lBqPomY/pl+U7W+iRheBf+iMJoYEYYZzEqCZ39VBEyeG UaG1RPDMgBUZrJno6bNgIFVsVu0sWUQs8fEH9WorUOBlI+4MCGkpiWjK5SSSnosY NVfYp6RwIcn5fkx9C7WEw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1682468271; x=1682554671; bh=r+5aubD/Xe0m6 azTCFwAC6cOt5tQ0EUVuwp2TQCWTVw=; b=VfHxHgzu1dEuoDBaC3pU/mbxJyY58 T0TXOy/ZcFaXnzeKFkAcJFMb7kZJ+WwslLsLLBIe++1J8H4QXTZZLu8VnA8pZehr GMadcifstWfN8KOivhMDPU0PI6K2QOXshWoWHTEm2jl1m1/KV8ma5CEMj5cnvqUl P1T9ahE9PlSClp59GKlaILXgEYBf/3qGi9c+jQSzbe933MZMk6Y5z8OyKhcb0M9b 0lgRVEd9xZ2YbQjQFiDMqfMXXulLKbC/tmsUN0+3HomCeL6dex0J9UXol+XmMXR0 /qstSWFlmjYbl2JQ1veAqTWCXhkx5ySrvIqUvwUTQcoKGY3ZR8bRx34nQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rm1IZOTIARQT8gF6QYvNOl2dKN6Y1HxnrG-XjpFAVbbzrN7Vd7xLHg> <xme:rm1IZDx9ZVHq5-e46LPOL5eAVyo4aCpm77dw8dPXNF8oIBeCFjnQenNZsN2VryeHa R2WE52d20rSLUJJs8w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfedufedgfeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehl ohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudelueeftdfhgeeiie eikeekjedvjefgveduffegfedvffelveefkeduieeikeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnh gvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:r21IZL2Sakl8WSFY3kuwAndE49xHGAyEhC1b1vOA0tn59vyBPEGD1g> <xmx:r21IZKC0VXPjv1ZSHgp_jwxV09b_MXbK9muqIhPJiZtbkVxEuy8BTQ> <xmx:r21IZHhsiZsFOVV0xFxeIO--EQACMHWhtvTVVuykqDnYHaOj7Ilj8g> <xmx:r21IZJebTVQjUSXZhBA37By4Y18vcpeWdcIg7Xszp4lY8rLgJmI5aw>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D90A5234007B; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 20:17:50 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-374-g72c94f7a42-fm-20230417.001-g72c94f7a
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <7674faf7-6bc8-41d6-80dd-f68e63c8d371@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPqePQwPAq5pWda1pGaY_=kLkcOxCjZWmOv9yRZ_MNb7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E024D9AC-2B92-4720-9713-519592D2362B@rfc-editor.org> <30c30c2f-4e96-560a-73dd-a51ba8d04714@comcast.net> <771B7586-FFBB-49E4-9B99-5578863FBD8B@rfc-editor.org> <CABcZeBOevOj8cWY7dacWxzwZS82+iAjf1p+DZWF=7WZ9JydnrQ@mail.gmail.com> <48de4d92-e279-4c26-ab3c-15dd854b56f8@betaapp.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBPqePQwPAq5pWda1pGaY_=kLkcOxCjZWmOv9yRZ_MNb7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:17:30 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfc-interest/77JslBWFcY2vcKMCBEQM8O0-0Q8>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] archiving outlinks in RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:17:57 -0000

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023, at 09:55, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Obviously the line between "style" and "content" is a fine, but istm that the
> line you propose to draw would allow the RPC to take all the MUSTs, style
> them out with CSS, and replace them with MUST NOTs.

Well, different renderings choose different destinations for links to RFCs, I think.  So we seem to be on the edge there.  And we have inline errata renderings.  I guess your position is that those are in scope for approval here too.

I should try swapping MUST and MUST NOT in CSS, that would be ... interesting.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email