IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Nothing like a Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EAF3A0A82; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNBnv5yZXFTk; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF3A13A0A80; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD24F4070D; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA8BF4070D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qh5nTsLJbJTo for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930D5F4070C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6665 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2020 00:48:34 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=1a07.5f98bfe2.k2010; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=rbuhAJ15JFg4TFhtRaz42w/WmDGpL18g+Oz3MnRc4eE=; b=UoFckIX3xWemtdk2PxQ1wS8nW6eE5inmDMAs1iVQowouhVOvCynsKrv36i3zGLEh0renzY5pu/7g+ztWAOOGE8VRF88oQhbm7c1aWaHBGiV7C1+SbQsBoiplS/h1kVAPlJpJgg0kLDTkMcRQJSQr0gvHTdhybKhdfzhFNuVTdPZkF93bnwjvVakXunERQNnZLyLjVnBJd5WsydwH9OWDeTsvuaVS5FCZne6fruxWAbZaoYLGMX+Miphg5FwL94oeeX+eKiNQLW+LyfUZ+O3WILm5SJDSEOqH7erI4uqVEPazY3kxIKp3OnjO8JK/Op7S0YtJTKCEh+d4eIEi9b6how==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 28 Oct 2020 00:48:33 -0000
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:48:33 -0400
Message-ID: <b2b770d4-48b3-6ba3-41e3-e16da3a3c2d@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwiVmE=qtSPCMD-3foPODL8bgETj3dQDKS-3BOM2021dEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Nothing like a Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ? (was: Re: John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences)
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, Jim Fenton wrote:
> What does seem strange (and maybe it has changed in the past year) is that 
> the plain text and PDF versions have tables of contents, and the html version 
> does not. I would like for the html version to have a table of contents with 
> links to anchors for each section.

The HTML version does have a TOC.  If your browser window is wide enough 
it's to the right of the text, otherwise a pulldown tab at the top..

I suppose that if your have javascript turned off it might not display.

R's,
John

PS: Please note reply-to.
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email