IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rfc-i] Setting Reply-To

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B023A0876; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRbCn1omkwVW; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFEB53A064A; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307F0F4072C; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5A0F4072C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yk9_xQbuhdfx for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF86AF40544 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 09SFnlUg030527 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:49:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1603900189; bh=SyrrbOf0D/tjJUxtfLdos0Z2ZhFaYIxNSnc95NEuGok=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=sFJxbkWg1V3QZ6y4BtNjCsco7okJIr5nvG1n4Q+sWeuYopU0WQ/d4vntM5JwK+onY NV/MEahfaGzIoerOII5xMAtvCPyQR4CQDnuYo4jyTJwYabgd7tfo0NQkLgxtXeQf5Q YVuAOhpH7C+kyFULWsxyKaaN3hdwEtGv9lCxNrlQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwiVmE=qtSPCMD-3foPODL8bgETj3dQDKS-3BOM2021dEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net> <7caa5bed-febc-dc71-ec0f-b4d4e951e01a@nostrum.com> <380F930D-96CA-4868-9001-5DC6C1157AA5@tzi.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <12c95563-8f0e-736f-d15b-61307c42e681@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:49:47 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <380F930D-96CA-4868-9001-5DC6C1157AA5@tzi.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: [rfc-i] Setting Reply-To
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, rsoc@iab.org, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I haven't run into that. I'm going to try to redirect this particular 
subthread to tools-discuss, with a Reply-To, and I'll go looking for 
where such stripping might take place.

RjS

On 10/28/20 10:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> One little problem with executing on this is that the IETF mailing list software seems to swallow Reply-To.  So there is no way to move comments to a message to a specific mailing list.
>
> Attempts to do such a move without the aid of reply-to usually don’t work (they just add more fragmentation to the discussion).
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email