IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 03 November 2020 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34EE3A0128; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:19:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZII4yVfPhXwa; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:19:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8C63A0138; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:19:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C97F40712; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:18:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DACBF40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYZICaSA6jFo for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161A7F4070F for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 04:18:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1604405950; bh=k4/QusYINko/vh4jqnuO4f4A334T9DOiQstzwmeb4q4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ug+lrVrpMftltpRvWQXmK+pZhRM/wNZnmjOH6eds1lk3LOjcnqJxWRxSlO12l5CQA pyDKeTqgbwhIuhlvIV79poJb9RYq1zqTGQb3vhJUtyzouXSqL6cz4XE7rtROjWf4mX jQLNVmoQGKQHyxn+ACQ+7jCAbahS0NMLCr8cykUM=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mf0BM-1k81At3aPK-00gZMM; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:19:09 +0100
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201028164053.GB12700@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <263C265C19B24BA97AF48934@PSB> <225062D7-C061-4543-8665-53A4F4831510@isc.org> <20201029005519.GT39170@kduck.mit.edu> <A05242FC-C38C-474F-A2AC-412329CA5C52@isc.org> <CAKq15ve-kAFZWH_f7=1XXC5PfxvO-sAzppB1fVTyqUufLftkVg@mail.gmail.com> <D2DB703DBF2A44A19B8F80DD@PSB> <CAKq15vdFVkG6_grNtqUqq-yDwj9QQcHJFZB5+RB-8fdxQXhFSw@mail.gmail.com> <fa36e919-b1a0-5b3c-9b42-54c6fdaadfb@iecc.com> <e8554ea2-1849-279f-733d-5798de8817b9@gmail.com> <26d1ff54-777f-884b-e35-d91e9fe59662@iecc.com> <00a1fc15-7559-96c6-7cd7-3ae5afd62237@gmail.com> <a34f219b-7c76-4b48-4844-5af3cd4f344@iecc.com> <be8dce95-2b4c-52c8-7eda-8a9b127a6dd4@gmail.com> <cdc14c1-54c9-5273-584c-ddb656912952@iecc.com> <5F9FDB7E.1080805@btconnect.com> <ae44e31b-964a-7901-4883-72abb0dbb8d3@gmx.de> <5F9FF8EA.9020809@btconnect.com> <bfa63584-1f49-1370-65d0-a217dcc4dbc5@gmx.de> <5FA14097.1000305@btconnect.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <b0dcba53-f660-5493-df25-2e19b4b45b33@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:19:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5FA14097.1000305@btconnect.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:u6wGR7G/VLu0Za27iYq7ART43HtChv64rmCR7giBNC08R32cHh2 jFGBgldwxUj6jNCqRPa8FXoyBpN5MeaaNiNbT0LpMf3powCcSGrDcpV7xC+/j6hbT0WL6Ap q+isoddy+hnw0SelL21Y9iDDjrI44/9bDYXWF6EztlHXkQ1BhCi7q4zRjGkz60/1t0M6d9m mFHYLBQFztEz4+Rg9ic5A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:solTDRA6h5o=:ehI+mNYQ9KF7zKT4TJm6S0 QhG93NuIfMxCJ7qFl2aEGqmhqCC6mC/OhmJuzZ9vyC48ztUvaggKleD+Kmc2SvaFq9aKDpsZm BDk0dUVjrder/LN31HlqbfPU/8pPCuxxmjl0g6dR4oWXoDZMQFlPKU1yClJdTn4hdQtJts70V 4BG5TvDn124Cdkic7D4FI4s2qYeFOabko8ISMzlm937sQdo3FYqOLqWWkrDHr1TUx9kKZfIm9 gC1VW6nwYcpVxRde5LYMe4bMpwufxyYMGNm6QYCKyE5je1eax2z2vVjGjIYH7ZvenQfnaLAIr 6V6x8aPrZGBWXy+5YaqcbPDbzwVOxZMhNhsD+hdz0iOjmOses3tFpYHaEsx1/KIVh6fORYe6V sqARrg1zt6+VACRkFTy21yczVcPdXGqtRaKXRjhVufgkvRtLJ2Omh/1hN7UT0HDmhv956Xe2+ YmDTE4wG9s/Mp/1TESGnk/scfZyzJ68gAeHm+alOW588sMRGLRc96DQWpKjWZzTtRangVptt4 NvyecYYvT0dYp57T8ALtFPpc1YVWUgdYIXtg3ow6M/Kpn9kIhOGWjCsLpRgHLUoKUGv5dBtew UIiWgiukpUHc/xemyf2JZC9r5NoLEhG77CIZ80ei+Y+J+0ZZCnNP2zujbbSjCHZG97PQEOswR 4uLn0QHARr7Bdwg/73/VAH5S+yBPhoLS4YMiraNTeTIyQwSYHfwrSlYxBFTRXUo1TT3c4SJt8 D6/hKXJK4W2Bnmx8AZKG4XvrlWU04iL8t52R3lvjdTORJoqdpR/OZD8XbuvnQuTlM9v3Djpmw YlB4QOOTw6G8edgUidocJtW0O1TUYRNEQFrMnAKYJbVSprU8W72AOnPp2KoqCoeeDsdw7BCfe dbJLTlrLH5YZsXs4e0dQ==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 03.11.2020 um 12:35 schrieb tom petch:
> ...
>> What you could do now: split the module into top-level artefacts and
>> place them into separate <sourcecode> elements. These can have anchors
>> the split tool could generate. Thus each of the pieces would have an
>> anchor you can link to.
>>
>> What might be desirable as xml2rfc feature: the ability to add line
>> numbers to <sourcecode>.
>>
>> I do understand that both would interfere with extraction code that has
>> been written for plain text, but that should not be needed/used anymore
>> in the v3 xml world anyway.
>
> That I do not understand.  What is different with the v3 xml world that
> the extraction code is not needed?  And is this also true for the checks
> that are performed on YANG modules that they 'compile' ok which I think
> are done automativally when a I-D with a YANG module in it is submitted
> (it is a while since I submitted an I-D with a YANG module it it)?
> ...

In the v3 world, you have by definition an XML document from which you
can trivially extract artwork/sourcecode sections, no matter how the
published plain text looks like.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email