Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE98B3A0E08 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lxUsni1tPdv for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A923A0D72 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC357F40713; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEBCF40713 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17HDTEDjy742 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD8DBF40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id s1so5459632lfd.3 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=70/KlsD180eTalNrhD8iQLNF8WWfkQZUm3OT6+O4DH0=; b=Jp7uFTj92JqMHpfEkA5enJrKekz1tDNDDD2VVqB0OhRNIkXUQH+Tg3vSNolb2T0OFI Ef1mb8BfwuyGRD5Pf0ceW/UnXZgG4ocTSPixdLlyTkmQggjw7Gmf1a5cfaSqtKL2ovSW 2JRbnsFoGA7890qNjqRsU1Wd5i4S+ckbxF71pQQBCj3P5F1f6K0ASLtubIg06BePvB3M 2veSHp5y8yjrNpBFiMU3msqJIGWEML4AYKkdH3SWObyK2MtOojhEcvTBdAJNzWjoVrI1 QXe8D3ir9ESW5Fg1iFSlS7W+LTg1jKGnaye7WWjZ3DztcpBwx9ssU3pzLYENy5Us74WM uMuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=70/KlsD180eTalNrhD8iQLNF8WWfkQZUm3OT6+O4DH0=; b=NMBEyHdyA7X8d/9WAuwLIdvUbot07+MHwN2fh29+eS9ZpY3vaYBPgM1Ke1dj8Ztjjq pceuO4q83k0eJhq558YZboSaOSUkep8QYVaXwfQOfxz1Jyl5iMvUyp4v7f0SGBeG4KQ/ 9bjvk6RWG3NdHICbjOG4M71ihDERCl+ZJcK2RNabJPoPdOgbsVVByJYXpQdLUfL/ZxAO 2AbRcGbzhWRbmOXnhGxV4JlH9aT+8WMX3YmL34p+Qyqu/dsEY3xeXbRrVVvx39geHmi1 AG/PDRqsaI2HoHasW+j3BsETsD6npH+u2hyBpaKQhKo29lNAVtnbpidSlxMYuB5AgP4v mUYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3mmiKgNO2ecQwXy6Nu/Y2DibLACNupUHrVCYIKZ6er+UQmte+n zsTJMl7Z6/gOmrU3WwKXeoaRQJUVvOPArPcayZe+cA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuDPhmXrEx7vFrwMTo/NHEJgfM7HmO76DaD/p75R9eNzpAfAob8Ey+R0Saybz2KGlE0uZVUnwl9qiDpgrhrq4g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:21b:: with SMTP id a27mr6415591lfo.55.1585241666988; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB4366823B2EE040B5C3A2FBA0B5CE0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20200325232451.GR30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9AA83737-63DF-4B4F-84FC-4BC6CAC7A50C@strayalpha.com> <20200325235405.GU30574@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <B8AC5A2C-4C65-4949-9C1A-C022E1479FEE@strayalpha.com> <6f5c3f41-4440-b594-a82e-9a403fe77fe3@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6f5c3f41-4440-b594-a82e-9a403fe77fe3@nostrum.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:53:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBO2vapFY9nE_RTbw83tkfWT4aSCFk-7WsH6ctPQGvznkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3526676401652107920=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Well, it seems like this assumes without much evidence that having three
separate metadata types won't just triple the amount of rehashing.

It seems like there are at least two much simpler fixes:

- Stop using Updates or any other such metadata entirely
- Replace Updates with "See Also" and have it explicitly have no semantics
at all

-Ekr


On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:18 AM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 3/25/2020 10:21 PM, Joseph Touch wrote:
> > What PROBLEM is driving this?
> >
> > Can we please STOP burning person-hours on this sort of nonsense?
>
>
> The problem is that the IESG keeps having to rehash this discussion on a
> document-by-document basis, which wastes the IESG's time. This is
> happening at the same time as the community is begging the IESG to
> figure out ways to lower ADs' workload so as to make it more attractive
> to a wider set of candidates.
>
> There is a straight line between those two points.
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest