Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 26 March 2020 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0193A0778 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=ghBYvAd5; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=uZs/FFid
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4BUt2ZX3xNQ for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44703A07B9 for <rfc-interest-archive-SieQuei0be@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC6DF406F7; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1538F406F7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=ghBYvAd5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=uZs/FFid
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBeU3Twx-L_p for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C10BF406D6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A98E3EB; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:02:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:02:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=A RXSYfvCG0DJ1RI1pRfclYkShfr7+QZD9xHgly+OF6Y=; b=ghBYvAd53Fop18nx8 aRz9vlVzlJ4/e/7PZYwuyH2hnf7aNZy6wDCa8BM6qyAnBxgOIuECWOWmVwFkpMPY jIH+qMrYChOGHaq4KSH9TbU6eY8JDNNPLkVcJP/dANFvcrygTBqrA7hbq7vRd4xc HlF/pgoLAxgjn4bHThgg1+Uy0n4JXXzGTNJFPir21yvw6ZutCMohKQIwSuLhSL0m tDCjG7Bb1ZKuw87H5tXDq0BeVMLJrvog+xxymLga064Lu3Y40B0WDs+RpMMCnEjB BxL20BUc0TxqmvNGGC1RbZKKEG1gyXHNJTXqdX1/dxBfOQpKQOKb8pA1dQ55OyKn 6NsCA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ARXSYfvCG0DJ1RI1pRfclYkShfr7+QZD9xHgly+OF 6Y=; b=uZs/FFidHkZYuaBgA1jZ4Hv5YTmmJ6cZzYZhygaed8X7mBltLJqRDBfad kab6//ZKu2ENOzo2BnG7c+Msq7kzgoA2+ptgJbPEcbaDqN6XkpKRFCoZCiyoiLOG J/qZhxjiVjJ93wePHXUnOZR88m7w1KCCWgxtUNPEYjEPGffPdr3ET1lq/+n11FIi gDCp0dKpnL6x7KZub/pTELCVnIWHPmFRzAkh7OW50PxP79axBApZtv+PMD5p3LJk mh/8gg5svvaDJDbXsM+rJRYyHYM32ZzH5Lan5gqqbWYdFJ3YEW/S5YLGA/EvQP7D gSgHJ/1LaXvAyp0xGgf4o+B5SkLpw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:GP97XoevkYcL68y9cEZcN7jNMbh6jOsUTb0J4O2PcXvhtqOdNRrU_w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehhedgvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhk ucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinh epmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrd hnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:GP97XmqHvmJe1L6aklKNdhkrdB3qdKXyCt-MnalGJzXdsRSJqFdr0w> <xmx:GP97XgwvXwWRf8OTFG-YaYyDh_PAtNmfZF7kZWgkrVCgS2jzyh-fjA> <xmx:GP97XkfsMFI-KSFnk-ixYm5AOmcfARwY8wek569oq9qufMGscw8RTQ> <xmx:Gf97XqQ_PkR2nzIaRPxb98bIzJLHBtFJhfXgi8MLFVHT9Pg2eL-57g>
Received: from macbook-pro.mnot.net (unknown [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 36ADF3067C6D; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:02:14 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9c06376f-a82d-b99d-947e-344cd9ad0557@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:02:11 +1100
Message-Id: <BE7F715F-A68B-4A07-ABC1-FC1EBBD03737@mnot.net>
References: <CAM4esxQDdY6L7N5ieVkEfZuGwDdtUnptvuVN69Bu744jLc2-xg@mail.gmail.com> <0DC4AE68-8410-4B0A-BB27-62D409F16964@mnot.net> <9c06376f-a82d-b99d-947e-344cd9ad0557@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] draft-kuehlewind-update-tag/
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


> On 26 Mar 2020, at 11:56 am, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> But, if that were worth discussing, it'd challenge a
> very fundamental tenet of the RFC series, and would
> surely therefore be worth at least it's own thread
> where you or someone would collate and present your
> evidence in some detail?

Because I have limited time to devote to this, and it's just an idea. If you don't like it, fine, but don't discard it because I don't meet your arbitrary bar for how to engage.

Thanks,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest