Re: [Rfced-future] Model proposal

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 07 July 2020 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752F3A0AC7 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Wzs2GiKx7Qn for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D9F73A0AC6 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.121.48] (76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 067LPqA8055049 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:25:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1594157154; bh=e2/6r/LtdfQCaoL62XoxiX0WwDCySjl276Xf/JO+N4Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=IYXZfc0bDNs8pJTECyFcSJv8X2Y2a4zoBFlpvK6+/LhQEz21ANVP1TTDZuxoUEuT1 4+FHsE6jFi6sJ5OgtJx/bk1cyXVdJLiW5DiZc0FZmQL2XPxFHIwXd1RSlzYyPyzCBt MNuniWHuZkYPwKLWubCpD6b4K+K+sw7gn/DXodf0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 76-218-40-253.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [76.218.40.253] claimed to be [172.17.121.48]
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, rfced-future@iab.org
References: <d4d1cd2d-6df2-4cb4-b63a-f9bba45b48c0@www.fastmail.com> <51b72823-f2a2-29bd-bd88-f63e13522387@gmail.com> <d1f33279-0656-4caa-81e7-aa665d3a4acb@www.fastmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <098fb5bf-f65c-d741-5fa7-baa6ae2c8358@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:25:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d1f33279-0656-4caa-81e7-aa665d3a4acb@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/4-am56R6IGtp0AyLR5hAnM_uK3w>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Model proposal
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 21:25:59 -0000

On 7/6/2020 11:18 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> separation of operational duties from the strategic allows us to properly scale the resources we dedicate to each task.  As operational matters dominate, then finding a lightweight process for managing strategy is best.


While we're on that topic: a huge portion of what makes the search for a 
single human to fill the currently-defined RSE role so incredibly 
difficult is the constraint of finding a unicorn who can do both 
operational and strategic tasks competently. The skill overlap between 
"library scientist" and "project manager" is pretty small, and we would 
have an infinitely easier time finding one of each rather than searching 
the earth for the extraordinarily rare people who can do both.

I think we need to design a model that explicitly separates these two 
different tasks to multiple responsible parties.

/a