IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Model proposal

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 07 July 2020 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C70C3A07F2 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nzg-pZCv8X96 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7303A00D6 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s9so50973021ljm.11 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KEs6Z1CeynTreJR7q42Xp0kW5mCc/l9pKAjhRYcPL+o=; b=VmGFD502PG8BjGd1Y7m9Z20mwRwCFml9tZ6cCSD7VCCtbIuOOFTePlWGVO3Nc3efxh Gyl7XtqHFFKpM/11NRQnpkKfWcW75NE6jL1JvsdjVisHtrcy4nLHqrqWgx6Mg0RkCSwL Wn8c9nUY5i9paV0S6dnxrdqZJODGjAy6QlZzyuZZ1d1/MHuMF2dtiU37mb/b1hOJdl/u AmT4YRhIwydHtw1AlsI5rnIYuhiompmdEE9tXS8U1dmnWACe9Bq0tLVnIhSl18Esks3d apt5/OeCkpvjriXIO2x+hyiybXHpljJrEKrHiZCWjAVChMjqOSFuMA052R+dHiC+IxE8 gJ6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KEs6Z1CeynTreJR7q42Xp0kW5mCc/l9pKAjhRYcPL+o=; b=hxM8ZdwWsUbh02RgHPNHysn7KEYHSnURMt/VrDtQYoaOV+u4+aDBj7gWixr92pC9hp cDYmm4JZvvkOkBHCGfglANWtCpYB6Dq/a/dLdgiDHMV+khJfbHfF5m1eGpLASv8xM7hG t3J/c1ROHpoRXfzrbeAUSDWASBUxtf5AhdyYeuz5kbz1y85ebt/XApvAgH4RMYiC077h 0/uyDPjEQSljbIy7jWwnbQZKi0S7R7KPmvK4+KC0MSaTMO+E281fR0KOB8HNn3Vjl//Q JEgBWIDO6tZDxh3C+QsfcYNhbt9Kqj9DbxunDIIl2mMKVZmP9gd3FpKGOBTdqWZzChls lBGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HRXhHneU7uFJv5ytDDWlGtHRjGTNArtN8SVgIRnSxLf1jjniZ rdnKqEkaqlmL1o7SVUM3JXgOf5vxv1XfiV6BQYH61Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwl+wiQPUSwqdVkKkevVN194l2MeLLDfjRnoatu10olDaIW8ZIZ6EMMMLZrDuxfek8q7tGLdazOflwd2LmIAa4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7819:: with SMTP id t25mr14389675ljc.17.1594145062724; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d4d1cd2d-6df2-4cb4-b63a-f9bba45b48c0@www.fastmail.com> <51b72823-f2a2-29bd-bd88-f63e13522387@gmail.com> <d1f33279-0656-4caa-81e7-aa665d3a4acb@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBMdrfjy+kqQ20MS_1fZrNddff+ycwau5VdC5qAFQN2qVA@mail.gmail.com> <20200707174930.GP3100@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20200707174930.GP3100@localhost>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:03:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMGxE6+29_BfNEANjZVJ=0UKFYM+pCp_ECsDw6e2aFMwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, rfced-future@iab.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002f3e1705a9ddd2f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/CQnK3IArsg-BROHeRxwuvVUok-U>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Model proposal
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 18:04:26 -0000

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:49 AM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:04:01AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:19 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> > > I do recall several lengthy discussions about the number of authors on
> a
> > > document, but as these were recurrent and inconclusive, I am of the
> view
> > > that these are perfect for a working group to strategize on.
> >
> > I'd like to focus in on this example for a moment, as it also consumed
> > a fair amount of IESG time, and I think it shows some of the
> > complexity here.
> >
> > [elided]
>
> Brian's point was that this is too much work for the IAB, and not
> Internet Architecture at that.  Martin's was that it was not too much
> work, so it's OK to have the IAB provide oversight.  You say this took a
> lot of the IESG's time.  So it sounds like you're with Brian?
>

Sorry, I should have been more clear. I think this is a proper subject for
IESG and IAB consideration, made somewhat more difficult by anchoring on a
historical five author limit that had (at least to me) a fairly unclear
rationale.

-Ekr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email