Re: [Rfced-future] Issue 144

[Scott Bradner <[e-mail]>]

agreed - not as clear as it might have been :-)

> On Jan 5, 2022, at 7:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 1/5/22 5:43 PM, Scott Bradner wrote:
>>  Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> However, I don't see exactly where it talks about advance notification for "other working group meetings". I must be missing something obvious.
>> 7.1. Session documents
>>    All relevant documents to be discussed at a session should be
>>    published and available as Internet-Drafts at least two weeks before
>>    a session starts.  Any document which does not meet this publication
>>    deadline can only be discussed in a working group session with the
>>    specific approval of the working group chair(s).  Since it is
>>    important that working group members have adequate time to review all
>>    documents, granting such an exception should only be done under
>>    unusual conditions.  The final session agenda should be posted to the
>>    working group mailing list at least two weeks before the session and
>>    sent at that time to [e-mail] for publication on the IETF web
>>    site.
> 
> Right, I suppose that counts as "advance notification" (even though it doesn't exactly say when a meeting is to be announced).
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Rfced-future mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future