Re: [Rfced-future] WGLC Review of the draft

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, at 18:24, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Allow me to attempt to frame this a bit with two questions:
>
>  * When can the RSAB trigger a broader community review?
>  * What is the harm and redress if the RSAB triggers an "inappropriate" 
> broader review?

Maybe don't worry about nailing this down.

Any RSWG participant can attempt to call on others to provide input.  That's all that would need to be.

That's not a formal "community review" as defined in process, but it's perfectly fine to ask for input.  Almost by any means or at any time.

What the input is will determine its effect.  If this input arrives during RSAB review, it might cause RSAB members to notice something of CONCERN.  Otherwise, it's more input to discussions.

That is, 

> If the RSAB receives input during its evaluation that indicates a potential problem with a proposal, an RSAB member can ballot a CONCERN position. The CONCERN position can cite the input that was provided and request that the RSWG consider what, if anything, to do to handle this problem.

As far as I can see, that's not a criterion for a CONCERN, it's a path to exercising one of the existing criteria.