Re: [Rfced-future] Issue 144

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Also wfm

Regards
    Brian

On 07-Jan-22 13:23, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 1/6/22 4:46 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>> On 2022-01-07 02:12, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>>> I suspect others may feel differently in that they don't want this to
>>>> be subject to changed IETF policies.
>>>
>>> I’d really like to hear from people who feel this as to what and why.
>>> I was just assuming this is like a WG in its behavior, and perhaps my
>>> assumption is completely wrong.
>>
>> I think in this case (advance notice), copy by reference is fine. In
>> others (RSAB mailing list, for example), copy by value may be better,
>> because as already said, the RSAB more like the Nomcom or so than an
>> average IETF WG.
> 
> If I'm reading the room correctly, we could say something like this:
> 
> ###
> 
> The RSWG is also empowered to hold in-person or online meetings,
> which should be announced with sufficient notice to enable broad
> participation; the [IESG Guidance on Face-to-Face and Virtual Interim
> Meetings](https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/interim-meetings-guidance-2016-01-16/)
> provides a reasonable baseline.
> 
> ###
> 
> Peter
>