IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard

Barry Dingle <btdingle@gmail.com> Fri, 04 March 2016 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <btdingle@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7761B377B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 04:10:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0w_qAg0nMHF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 04:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161141B373F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 04:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id xx9so47949986obc.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 04:10:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qkK+3+iSA1eoU6HuDfrz8CJVGebywjGbEfbbLzAZsWE=; b=ePlG64SGsNVKq7vrYB1e0PwozucMoBYWCty1zkNot6s9XjBUcAdaqTsKZMMFwlLSmO RoRF2xOONx2HyB/fnZAC9ZU7QOSjw1nn3O8TyMutJ54sQh/cM1pVs6VHtSCMAJvNxr5J 9hqP9buV7GvaTk6R/QOhPw8c7Q+X3e0dMZutU/jYGXoPY2Sn7EzH+oT9ajhp8y0ryiQ/ 77llvmIBsCxeluqVFgx/V4BQkcWReLEIqTFqw6xYeABEs/8MkSGCGBc3GLsqtr9FtVd4 zT/YnsTw/ySJXScwWYHo9DNcXORt8eUoPWhILJ9Fs0J8pD84Nx7yOJMPZL0Zzgk2rQDz tY3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qkK+3+iSA1eoU6HuDfrz8CJVGebywjGbEfbbLzAZsWE=; b=Z7IgYa/c83oamamVWfpeTr/QYEBgXUqAOou8PbcAN90qxZv+OCRf7VZ+Q4Spb2QpOH 0u6nFP6Tg4Q7YXQaukqSYCA/MLi2QjeYIiiCxOQoEEsWnNT/Gu/w/xo+Sv9Jn6M5Mq/E oinzBcnkcXqdQ/778JoSE0sQ9MJAYE35Ga/fc8rDtMOTgjr1zus+oSzZOArlHIbgz6S7 /VfMPqvEhGkxouMSIrg2z3eIR9ENM4GbGn/SA2XpQDc3Nc65llitU23ZgYB/QXqdZxYR CocKJbWrSa5ZJs+6mGt7gizZvp5gMYZ2qP0m7AkIKepbusmwHrxiw4UZ+rkAQJnDDDwB GRNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLT8pZC20Ecr8t2gzZIoLE+wcb/+sLp8/6PIfg+PDFiucRvdMfg0xtdETOeX2d5KVDeTxzPRW/EUdsioA==
X-Received: by 10.182.196.104 with SMTP id il8mr5593543obc.71.1457093408460; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 04:10:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.17.69 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 04:09:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVK8eYrqCvhgYG-+1hqQ_vFY-jwDrHnCb2whY4PQD060A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160224213121.376.85278.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN1PR0301MB15512FBBCA5186B4829FEFA8B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B374B9596@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <SN1PR0301MB1551D1333297368D66B150ACB2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxvf+HBknqxXXY=_t9sCFGUFMUczu6k5DkMS-M8aV0Sjxw@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551006A8D73179743E85322B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMBGzjJFbLpo4te12tpaFFS_aoEXmoARudkq1EbZ5AnuYw@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551CDEEA6EA1C7A696972B7B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMA++uB6p0QYgWtgYtd9ysa9F5jb2wZnSm=Q-Fgig06_zg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB15514DE72ED6C92766D32E80B2BD0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <56D824BD.2080305@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxvVZuyHqWDZCcbOAYJTzKoFA4cm1DvvHoe8Zjm4LTRh3w@mail.gmail.com> <56D86A45.70406@alvestrand.no> <SN1PR0301MB15514E3DE966D04694948F16B2BE0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <56D9678C.5050405@alvestrand.no> <SN1PR0301MB1551530E434AC2A2BEBA45D3B2BE0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnVK8eYrqCvhgYG-+1hqQ_vFY-jwDrHnCb2whY4PQD060A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Dingle <btdingle@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 23:09:48 +1100
Message-ID: <CAN=GVAs0Gpd=Pz=d4L1QtyCpULiBwPQVEOefYA2HDbLNVS8M2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0149c6360416af052d37ff01"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/6UxSipEcbnRPmK9gFKY5g7Fw1zs>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 12:10:10 -0000

I endorse Martin's comments.

DTMF is >50 yo technology. We are supporting it in WebRTC/rtcweb to enable
interworking with legacy real-time communications.

If you want to add App-specific user signalling in WebRTC/rtcweb, I suggest
you look at using the *WebRTC/rtcweb Data Channel*. Really simple to set up
- and there are no analog-telephony type limitations.

Cheers,
/Barry

Barry Dingle
University of Melbourne, Australia

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This thread has gone on too long.
>
> On 4 March 2016 at 22:22, Asveren, Tolga <tasveren@sonusnet.com> wrote:
> > I understand very well what is defined by W3C and what by IETF RTCWEB WG.
>
> Let's do away with that nonsense and address the issue squarely.  Both
> Roman and Harald have provided you with solid technical arguments.
> You have chosen to be un-swayed by those arguments, which is fine,
> that's your prerogative.  However, it is clear that you have not
> convinced anyone else to support your position either.
>
> Thus, from my observer position, *this* working group has consensus to
> impose limits.  Maybe one of the chairs is able to make a similar
> assessment and, please, close this thread.
>
> --Martin (who is for some reason unable to mute this thread)
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email