Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard

Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BFD1A037E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXePITOqEbtH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5B51A039C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:34 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79836d000006396-76-56d57a4cf0bc
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.87]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 70.0B.25494.C4A75D65; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:17:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.73]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:17:32 +0100
From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
To: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHRb/efeEnpNaWjrEeaxVOONL18hQ==
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:17:32 +0000
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B374B9596@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <20160224213121.376.85278.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD5OKxuQT2hdDHWdVxHGEcC3PuMMDjpaBpfAygRBa7-kdv79Rg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB15519E82B0384EF6EC348B72B2B80@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <56D1A080.7050901@alvestrand.no> <SN1PR0301MB1551A6D49F18116A70A107CCB2B80@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMB5pye7-tXgBFrzk+F-3dApY-4pEX_1Foob-ug6dmztXg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551506B16DC14D555E98AD4B2BA0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMAxR0_HzpqM3aQwVBX51G87+ZnYpd7AEwHsw0unpcPV1w@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551C791B62BC7311DB3897CB2BA0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxtonFCucoou8Es+0RCuBx-oa++w5__=EBXT7kVToksE4A@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB155111CC2AAC4D3B0962B3E6B2BA0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMAk_jPu5Pd1kU6aEh2au5x-tE4v+c9zU5nzx64t47DUmQ@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB15518F98FD31A3BAE6505079B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <56D55FE9.60408@alvestrand.no> <SN1PR0301MB15512FBBCA5186B4829FEFA8B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprIIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7uK5v1dUwg7V32S2O9XWxWaz9185u MbvzPZNF41w7BxaPKxOusHrsnHWX3WPJkp9MHpc+/2cPYInisklJzcksSy3St0vgylh96Dpb wVGpip8tT9gbGLvFuhg5OSQETCSWLLnGAmGLSVy4t54NxBYSOMwocXmVexcjF5C9iFHi7pyT rF2MHBxsAsESTX/dQGpEBCol3v6fwwxiMwuoS9xZfI4dpF5YoI9RYsLvq6wgjohAP6PEgjNN zBAdehItt2cygdgsAioSX1f3g8V5BXwl1u2+zAqx7TiHxNt9r8CKGIFO+n5qDRPECnGJW0/m M0GcKiCxZM95ZghbVOLl43+sELaixM6z7VAnGUi8PzcfytaWWLbwNdQyQYmTM5+wTGAUnYVk 7CwkLbOQtMxC0rKAkWUVo2hxanFxbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmBEHdzyW3cH4+rXjocY BTgYlXh4C85eCRNiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwnu89GqYEG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcV62 T5fDhATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYyL5V38zIoWXSh5e/2M0NwEWSMVhY1PInzWnWvYds7Q 981Rr/PPtzMtNODvey164nqkV8mh0mlWsq+jL8fMWdVkyt/7cdEkvnyF62tCehwtrA6aiDx7 NpPH3msP/745ijodZ06fkzc4KDUx9/HZi8IzJyuyKb/7qVTsevDFHZfGf8k9T5b1CD5TYinO SDTUYi4qTgQA0v8YfaQCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/JVflciqHrltDFhrxhjuckqzJj5E>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:17:37 -0000

On 01/03/16 11:18, Asveren, Tolga wrote:
> Well, in your case, it is obviously app. developers fault to supply
> duration/interval without knowing what they mean/what he is doing
> (assuming those values are breaking something for whatever reason for
> that particular deployment). This would be a bug on the
> application/unintelligent behavior by the app. developer. I am for
> convenience and accommodating people who are not savvy about DMTF
> aspects but enforcing limits to guard against stupidity would
> sacrifice flexibility, which IMHO is another important aspect. And
> enforcing min/max would do exactly that, limiting flexibility.

I don't think increasing flexibility is a good reason per se. If that 
was the guiding principle all browser APIs would be on a very low level.

Is there a use case that can't be supported with the current spec?

Stefan

>
> Thanks, Tolga
>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Harald Alvestrand
>> [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 4:25
>> AM To: Asveren, Tolga <tasveren@sonusnet.com>; Ted Hardie
>> <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>;
>> rtcweb@ietf.org Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call:
>> <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing
>> Requirements) to Proposed Standard
>>
>> Den 01. mars 2016 09:04, skrev Asveren, Tolga:
>>> i- I thought I answered that aspect but here it goes again with
>>> an example:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> App Developer, who knows what he is doing:
>>>
>>> API call:
>>>
>>> Send_DTMF_Digit(“5”, duration=2000ms, interval=60ms)
>>>
>>> Browser uses the values supplied in the API call. It does not
>>> enforce any checks.
>>>
>>> App. Developer may use different values based on the negotiated
>>> codec.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> App Developer, who is not savvy about DTMF digits:
>>>
>>> API call:
>>>
>>> Send_DTMF_Digit(“5”)
>>>
>>> Browser uses its default values for duration and interval.
>>>
>>> Browser default values may be different based on the negotiated
>>> codec.
>>>
>>> Different browsers may use different default values but this does
>>> not cause any problem from App. Dev. perspective.
>>>
>>
>> The other way to look at it:
>>
>> App developer who doesn't know what he's doing:
>>
>> Send_Dtmf_Digit("5", duration=10)
>>
>> Runs on Chrome. It works on his test system. Deploys to a thousand
>> users.
>>
>> Someone runs it on Firefox.
>>
>> "Illegal value".
>>
>> Files a bug against Firefox. Wastes a lot of people's time. In the
>> meantime, the Chrome users discover that the DTMF-sending app only
>> works part of the time, and files bugs against Chrome for not
>> sending reliable DTMF.
>>
>> Lots of time wasted for all. People's distrust of DTMF ever working
>> reliably goes up.
>>
>> What's the benefit of NOT having a hard limit?
> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>