IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 04 March 2016 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA3D1B36F5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 03:33:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lau5zIxB4Xyb for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 03:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22b.google.com (mail-io0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C841B36F3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 03:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l127so59326086iof.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:33:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=RHSPkU5JmA+l+QBw9O+bd0YeKRwR9hFuKClTwLRuiO8=; b=wMashlsN6znp8njzKwy8Ruthu2Az07wEsc/6fij3LYz/zapaTZKuiogDYLJdo8AefR cgJ8vRbvnGNq96X5zTxOvhRjFhyJoUbTKUfBAyqGNOq0pWmjuqV4MMKzqvN83KNgS7kZ yDvZsnVhes0vGWsEVtQebyc/UZuUlqKONAX546bdvc0TDB3Y+HnYkA2xzw1zIlZN2Brg rTcYx1CWPwacGScvjXtyzxirKT7h3mPhfpw8ONksMr2vrvW7TS+tE3ZWyoAk1gCvlnTB uuYbbrtKVWX8mCpiPWYtw531+N1QqS/ZtwwyxwuFETSTxEbbpQnGtiYrBThfTGdRPIj0 JdXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=RHSPkU5JmA+l+QBw9O+bd0YeKRwR9hFuKClTwLRuiO8=; b=RzikLa/aTtPgQUi9Mo4ofdBGS4zWnm6i99+F+kAT5/BhSKWebAfTPa4eKRiAYI8ISZ UxA7n7Qt0tWwJMiH6Nx9dn7thhdeNmaDcDqiTuAt3EfyJ8iJwm4I5ZOIBX1Lha4mQ/Wy uyyEZBMKLunr78d5SWpRsWwzo2GGKgXE6DYu1rV5+Tl/gLwB2FZsIh8ankltn8req7WW F9iA8DLBth3Mlll2LrVacw2c8BsBg/AfhJbIeBX754andhUbZhqlRhfw1d+eTU++v96y CNhw0qKPFsvmpGBMPXr/bkAzCW8yQ+BKflJlj/UKBbmjM14FvocBJ/nAQGuIwuz2tGyk 2B8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLhzYStRVF4CDHRlNpyQuPc2Sn+tFbvTEc84d4lYwTazLU4vKnK/NLl005RzxNP0N8pNBBQsTyDhBxRlg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.41.133 with SMTP id p127mr8213813iop.100.1457091208474; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:33:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 03:33:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0301MB1551530E434AC2A2BEBA45D3B2BE0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160224213121.376.85278.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <SN1PR0301MB15512FBBCA5186B4829FEFA8B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B374B9596@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <SN1PR0301MB1551D1333297368D66B150ACB2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxvf+HBknqxXXY=_t9sCFGUFMUczu6k5DkMS-M8aV0Sjxw@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551006A8D73179743E85322B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMBGzjJFbLpo4te12tpaFFS_aoEXmoARudkq1EbZ5AnuYw@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551CDEEA6EA1C7A696972B7B2BB0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CA+9kkMA++uB6p0QYgWtgYtd9ysa9F5jb2wZnSm=Q-Fgig06_zg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB15514DE72ED6C92766D32E80B2BD0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <56D824BD.2080305@alvestrand.no> <CAD5OKxvVZuyHqWDZCcbOAYJTzKoFA4cm1DvvHoe8Zjm4LTRh3w@mail.gmail.com> <56D86A45.70406@alvestrand.no> <SN1PR0301MB15514E3DE966D04694948F16B2BE0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <56D9678C.5050405@alvestrand.no> <SN1PR0301MB1551530E434AC2A2BEBA45D3B2BE0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 22:33:28 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVK8eYrqCvhgYG-+1hqQ_vFY-jwDrHnCb2whY4PQD060A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/l-gc0s4ZEK37Ul87KCNWLUgRRUw>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:33:30 -0000

This thread has gone on too long.

On 4 March 2016 at 22:22, Asveren, Tolga <tasveren@sonusnet.com> wrote:
> I understand very well what is defined by W3C and what by IETF RTCWEB WG.

Let's do away with that nonsense and address the issue squarely.  Both
Roman and Harald have provided you with solid technical arguments.
You have chosen to be un-swayed by those arguments, which is fine,
that's your prerogative.  However, it is clear that you have not
convinced anyone else to support your position either.

Thus, from my observer position, *this* working group has consensus to
impose limits.  Maybe one of the chairs is able to make a similar
assessment and, please, close this thread.

--Martin (who is for some reason unable to mute this thread)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email