IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard

"Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com> Thu, 25 February 2016 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96BA1B334F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ta5mfw3XxLxv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0063.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CA891B334E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:44:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=SonusNetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-sonusnet-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=jBEP//kkia2HpEHOb/OGf49mRtRCyoPG2zyymZbixNQ=; b=USS9zZ/yhZn3dQ86U9+ymU+CcTOrwN1bGkBqyzCLhYlQ/9w20lQRjUdQdnVQfbPhoW9F9cpPtf4qxwTWvZF41wIw6WGXpZIHWnuZ2/fHMjPKJRyKA5VY2pc09wX0BULPEtAysg0zTPDPn6SeaubaxtpgcAUwCfMhDP5IJHnBvRo=
Received: from SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.129.157) by SN1PR0301MB1552.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.129.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.409.15; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:44:43 +0000
Received: from SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.129.157]) by SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.129.157]) with mapi id 15.01.0409.024; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:44:43 +0000
From: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHRb/eiM09Ybg6t2Eavei5prgOW+p89Kcur
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:44:42 +0000
Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB15510A18734956A22BD5FB5AB2A60@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160224213121.376.85278.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD5OKxsa9cwYOLqkHDVjoe2vr8NoOsPYO7jD_4TPNSnxU7u53Q@mail.gmail.com> <56CE2CF4.70001@jmvalin.ca>, <CA+9kkMAqNZiHX7asFZnNgMnJw3G2bPBB7zXfLex3xdkfcW2tQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMAqNZiHX7asFZnNgMnJw3G2bPBB7zXfLex3xdkfcW2tQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=sonusnet.com;
x-originating-ip: [73.29.18.75]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 40745723-a1db-4b80-c7a4-08d33e1c1ba2
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0301MB1552; 5:/+v1bnQwetLgC/Iahjv++haSIBja1rXnglLezfG7kMlz4LChoVka5MDXLaxOe/wafDhozIXxZI6rp8B8c2l7dMAJ86bexGBrqe7MUideJ1ydu++yDWAmhLRl883k5KjH681sIZSdVVczTPFHMjxZAw==; 24:QF/pTdZsNJUsFjJ3WAEG3r/E7fqWXmWprJw3/1nmPu629k+HcVJSIAgLGZdiJRhT3c6I1n7dXHx0ujVICAM7nVQA6U+h8PoMTNQyyriRJwU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1552;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR0301MB1552567C28D80A5635675016B2A60@SN1PR0301MB1552.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1552; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1552;
x-forefront-prvs: 08635C03D4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(377454003)(24454002)(164054003)(479174004)(3900700001)(19625215002)(19617315012)(92566002)(6116002)(15975445007)(99286002)(3280700002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(74316001)(3660700001)(1096002)(77096005)(5001770100001)(40100003)(16236675004)(2501003)(33656002)(2950100001)(10400500002)(122556002)(11100500001)(54356999)(76176999)(19627405001)(2906002)(5001960100002)(107886002)(5004730100002)(106116001)(87936001)(50986999)(3846002)(102836003)(5003600100002)(189998001)(2900100001)(1220700001)(5008740100001)(76576001)(5002640100001)(93886004)(230783001)(66066001)(586003)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0301MB1552; H:SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN1PR0301MB15510A18734956A22BD5FB5AB2A60SN1PR0301MB1551_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sonusnet.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Feb 2016 19:44:42.9437 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 29a671dc-ed7e-4a54-b1e5-8da1eb495dc3
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0301MB1552
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/HmLVjFPw2t_TBV9XBDmmeeKxjAo>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:44:51 -0000

Roman,


What is the rationale of having this "MUST" strength mandate?


Thanks,

Tolga


________________________________
From: rtcweb <rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:07 PM
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard

Mailman claims this was auto-discarded and it doesn't show in the archives, so I'm forwarding.  I will separately check on why it got chucked.

regards,

Ted
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca<mailto:jmvalin@jmvalin.ca>>
Date: Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> (WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements) to Proposed Standard
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>, alcoop@cisco.com<mailto:alcoop@cisco.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio@ietf.org>


On 02/24/2016 04:42 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> Generated events MUST have duration of no more than 6000 ms and no
> less than 40 ms with the recommended default duration of 100 ms for each
> tone. The gap between events MUST be no less then 30 ms with the
> recommended default duration of 70 ms.

OK, I missed that part, but I'm fine with it. Unless anyone objects, I
can add it to the draft.

        Jean-Marc


> Regards,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:31 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org<mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> <mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org<mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>>> wrote:
>
>
>     The IESG has received a request from the Real-Time Communication in
>     WEB-browsers WG (rtcweb) to consider the following document:
>     - 'WebRTC Audio Codec and Processing Requirements'
>       <draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
>     The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>     final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>     ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org> <mailto:ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>> mailing lists by 2016-03-09.
>     Exceptionally, comments may be
>     sent to iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org> <mailto:iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>> instead. In either
>     case, please retain the
>     beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
>     Abstract
>
>
>        This document outlines the audio codec and processing requirements
>        for WebRTC endpoints.
>
>
>
>
>     The file can be obtained via
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio/
>
>     IESG discussion can be tracked via
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio/ballot/
>
>
>     No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rtcweb mailing list
>     rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org> <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email