Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03E71ADED9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkaGwnT3NIRw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4141ADF38 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e14so12932127iej.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a74KHRtXK75FJfcDgXFX9HJKkSJfw/K2t6VbT/LvzNo=; b=Bfr9qBMqnpCZ/rnJUQQUShpw9dpczFpjZ1P30dA6z2saDt/fUuf71u/oPa9+kcXKZO 3hSOcXCGnSYxQZuvfHDB7/NgLk58gYmpZHgdzoahtnIKsfoeS0VVse9I2hnq54K4b9Xt gpJhBMvmFkNXtA91BbUeRXP5ICZorILrXfhtnQwOKFaSzOmvyKnJVAl+cLXDmi2KgzGu SDj823/aSzbKm+Abq1xtuuuYfVojdW0GRq23avQosWYxcBnyQ13vqPY0upauTBAe8kIP HflFnNq4SUZ2ZQzKprEOXfrSkqBx6HtOdBxHcjV7PIfmmoIZ01Few5+PXV5hw3Dp8dC0 8dgQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.61.205 with SMTP id s13mr23678101igr.29.1385588186005; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.104.130 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548AE06C@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
References: <5295B358.1040302@ericsson.com> <5295DA58.60504@jitsi.org> <5295E663.4020607@ericsson.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548ADD3C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548AE06C@XMB111CNC.rim.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:36:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBe_ezjSQYq7fQWZJAy=eNpcUPrvHtWkGCmA3whxSGf5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Gaelle Martin-Cocher <gmartincocher@blackberry.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7679aa1c62504ec2f6362
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 21:36:30 -0000

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher <
gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote:

> If we proceed with the vote, I would like to see the following choice:
> All entities must support H263.
>
> Thanks
> Gaëlle
>
>
I've updated the wiki to include this as choice 13.  If you have a
reference that we could use that specifies version, annexes, or any other
additional detail, we can include a pointer.

Ted


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gaelle
> Martin-Cocher
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:29 AM
> To: Magnus Westerlund; Emil Ivov
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> alternatives
>
> Dear All,
>
> Sorry for this late message, I was not available this past week.
>
> It has been mentioned by a few of us that the risks on VP8 that some can't
> leave with, can be mitigated when VP8 becomes an ISO standard (via MPEG).
> VP8 has a chance to become an MPEG deliverable in January. I believe that
> could make a few of us more comfortable with supporting/mandating both H264
> and VP8 and could change the consensus reaching process.
>
> Can we give VP8 that chance before forcing a vote?
>
> Thanks
> Sincerely,
> Gaëlle
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus
> Westerlund
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:33 AM
> To: Emil Ivov
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> alternatives
>
> On 2013-11-27 12:41, Emil Ivov wrote:
> > Just to confirm, this is NOT the last day of discussion on whether a
> > vote is the right way to do this at all, right?
>
> No, but tomorrow a week will have passed since we chairs sent out the
> proposal and solicited feedback on the proposal.
>
> >
> > That sounds like it would still be an open question for step two here:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html
>
> As we stated in this message, after the week we chairs would update the
> process proposal if we considered it necessary. I believe there are some
> clarifications that needs to be done, including the voter eligibility.
>
> After that the stated plan was to hold a consensus call in the WG to use
> the proposed process.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>