Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB901ADF66 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVPm8WkcybSM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7AD1AD6A4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ar20so13017940iec.16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NEXESCo4URTJ6J8JwROsRV6sU5x1sZik8CFmCKO8wSY=; b=NqlX7LqJwbM0oWQBpW/jlFPUYtIWfdxtK5WWPLD5eQlzMIhJF97OjbxEXIdq6heV+S 5PVrIPP9ItGFSRt8VqsHtu/gsQMV0GKlvo6gDeokG8SBaSIBFSzbjAw5bxskoG7IYjtq PZuFMI7jJfw8HFX2cLouGrpDm163XTGBiMrgeXpvPbu82iipGdwMel/K+oJB05iXTnCe JQ1fyZi45G8QQfbyBlNUmqZAFnpuFWPZp2bRKo9svhjVSoFyICHLxgs3rJgyd7IgJUS5 Lk/fWvF2egBWnwaHZWPGeDTA/Y0BzwbHrgzHDyHefJY8An21sbkjHqx5aCha6AxeMtzo cOWw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.178.135 with SMTP id ow7mr10271714icc.43.1385590061847; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.104.130 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp8n2mP2VC37r0L9BGkbW-ZrQk3uDWQKqyY8Qs_Ugc8HbNDzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5295B358.1040302@ericsson.com> <5295DA58.60504@jitsi.org> <5295E663.4020607@ericsson.com> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548ADD3C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <92D0D52F3A63344CA478CF12DB0648AA548AE06C@XMB111CNC.rim.net> <CA+9kkMBe_ezjSQYq7fQWZJAy=eNpcUPrvHtWkGCmA3whxSGf5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2mP2VC37r0L9BGkbW-ZrQk3uDWQKqyY8Qs_Ugc8HbNDzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:07:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMA5dLOZe419JDUzQ6Q=ejeGNMZcQ-XBneNEpu+KvCahXA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c30bec70df3e04ec2fd396
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 22:07:46 -0000

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> Could we please include also:
> All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264 CBP, Theora}
>
>
Added as item 14.

Ted


> Thanks,
> Silvia.
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Gaelle Martin-Cocher
> > <gmartincocher@blackberry.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If we proceed with the vote, I would like to see the following choice:
> >> All entities must support H263.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Gaëlle
> >>
> >
> > I've updated the wiki to include this as choice 13.  If you have a
> reference
> > that we could use that specifies version, annexes, or any other
> additional
> > detail, we can include a pointer.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gaelle
> >> Martin-Cocher
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:29 AM
> >> To: Magnus Westerlund; Emil Ivov
> >> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> >> alternatives
> >>
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> Sorry for this late message, I was not available this past week.
> >>
> >> It has been mentioned by a few of us that the risks on VP8 that some
> can't
> >> leave with, can be mitigated when VP8 becomes an ISO standard (via
> MPEG).
> >> VP8 has a chance to become an MPEG deliverable in January. I believe
> that
> >> could make a few of us more comfortable with supporting/mandating both
> H264
> >> and VP8 and could change the consensus reaching process.
> >>
> >> Can we give VP8 that chance before forcing a vote?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Gaëlle
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus
> >> Westerlund
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:33 AM
> >> To: Emil Ivov
> >> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection
> >> alternatives
> >>
> >> On 2013-11-27 12:41, Emil Ivov wrote:
> >> > Just to confirm, this is NOT the last day of discussion on whether a
> >> > vote is the right way to do this at all, right?
> >>
> >> No, but tomorrow a week will have passed since we chairs sent out the
> >> proposal and solicited feedback on the proposal.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > That sounds like it would still be an open question for step two here:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html
> >>
> >> As we stated in this message, after the week we chairs would update the
> >> process proposal if we considered it necessary. I believe there are some
> >> clarifications that needs to be done, including the voter eligibility.
> >>
> >> After that the stated plan was to hold a consensus call in the WG to use
> >> the proposed process.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Magnus Westerlund
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> >> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> >> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> >> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> >> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error,
> >> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your
> >> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> >> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> >> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> >> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> >> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
> error,
> >> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your
> >> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> >> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rtcweb mailing list
> >> rtcweb@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>