Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec Selection alternatives

It appears different because not only would it not choose an MTI codec from among the present list of alternatives, but it also would take the MTI discussion off the table in the future as well. 
> From: pgiralt@cisco.com
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:14:05 -0500
> To: martin.thomson@gmail.com
> CC: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Last day for any additional Video Codec	Selection	alternatives
> 
> How is that different from Option 7? 
> 
> -Paul
> 
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 27 November 2013 00:54, Magnus Westerlund
> > <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >> Today (27th November) is the last day to propose any additional
> >> alternatives for the Video Codec Selection.
> > 
> > Just to cover all bases, I think that there is one important option missing:
> > 
> > X. The working group MUST make no MTI recommendation regarding video codecs.
> > 
> > Just to put it on the table at this level.  I suspect that many will
> > prefer this over their most hated alternatives.
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb